Wikipedia is not the Achilles heel of free access to information. The Achilles heel are the sources: libraries, websites.
Consider donating to the internet archive instead or as well. If the sources are poisoned, Wikipedia just repeats bullshit. It's secondary literature.
Utilitarianism would lead you to that decision, you can justify any atrocity with it.
they get all content for free though, unlike netflix etc.
I mean, Gaza is larger than just Gaza city so it could be done eventually I guess but the timeline is laughable.
what about sublime? it has projects, folder file trees...
i use sublime instead
Honor to your union
as soon as possible the ad free version becomes ad light
yeah same with YouTube plus: if you pay, they can sell your data at a premium, because you're in the group that can be made to pay
parts of that design difference is the size: western tanks are all larger silhouette, which they had to pay to have better accuracy at extreme ranges
afaik, they're made for defense in depth and retreating at their effective range while thinning out attacking tanks
no, it's because the core doctrine and design (at least of the leopard 1/2) is to use them in defensive battles against larger numbers of tanks - that was the entire NATO strategy in western Europe during the cold war, when all of that hardware was designed
not for rolling into unknown territory and getting hit by entrenched infantry AT, as Turkey discovered a few years ago
I know people who are left leaning democrats and they're for gun control. But gun control doesn't solve the problem entirely.
The problem is the entire culture around guns and toxic 'me and my gun and my truck' self sufficiency culture in the US and the lack of a social net.