this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
199 points (89.3% liked)

World News

32283 readers
757 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Western-made armor is failing in Ukraine because it wasn't designed to sustain a conflict of this intensity, a military analyst told The Wall Street Journal.

Taras Chmut, a military analyst who's the head of the Come Back Alive Foundation, which has raised money to purchase and provide arms and equipment to Ukraine, said that "a lot of Western armor doesn't work here because it had been created not for an all-out war but for conflicts of low or medium intensity."

"If you throw it into a mass offensive, it just doesn't perform," he said.

Chmut went on to say Ukraine's Western allies should instead turn their attention to delivering simpler and cheaper systems, but in larger quantities, something Ukraine has repeatedly requested, the newspaper reported.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 year ago (33 children)

Western armor isn't meant to be driven across the country into battle on the front lines. It's meant to operate in areas of air dominance where most defensive fortifications have been bombed well in advance. It's also designed to be able to attack and move with speed and accuracy, not charging forward.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

parts of that design difference is the size: western tanks are all larger silhouette, which they had to pay to have better accuracy at extreme ranges

afaik, they're made for defense in depth and retreating at their effective range while thinning out attacking tanks

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

The large silhouette is more of an armour/survivability thing rather than a FCS/accuracy thing

load more comments (31 replies)