atomicpoet

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

Of course it’s discouraging because any deviation from a norm requires change, and people by their nature hate change.

But I’ve been on the Fediverse for quite a few years, and nothing moves the needle like stubbornness.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, it’s the name of both the character and the game.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Marlow Briggs. It's kind of like God of War but way more funny.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Be the change. Start discussing those things, and others will eventually discuss it with you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

Atari's recent games have been pretty good. And it is nice that this is being developed by the same folks who made BIT.TRIP.

However, it is really hard to make something new and fresh with the old Breakout formula.

 

Go beyond the bricks in Breakout Beyond! From developers Choice Provisions (BIT.TRIP), comes a brand new way to experience Breakout. This neon-drenched take on the classic game will have you rack up never-ending combos and use power-ups to reach the goal. Breakout Beyond is coming soon!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Unnoticed? Not at all. The Guinness World of Records recognizes this game as the first to "utilise basic stealth game mechanics".

https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/first-console-game-to-use-stealth

I happen to disagree with them, but they certainly noticed.

The reason you've never played this game is because it didn't have a dedicated cabinet. It used the Raster Scan Convert-a-Game system. Which means many of the cabinets that were once used for this game no longer host it. And if that's not enough 005 never got a home port.

It is also highly likely Konami knew about 005 since this game was developed and made by SEGA, got great reviews upon its release, and well, Metal Gear used its mechanics.

 

Now, why is it super unlikely that you’ve played this game? Because it was only ever released in arcades. And it wasn’t exactly a huge runaway success. But in terms of actual gameplay mechanics, this game had some monumental firsts.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I wrote a really extensive review of this game right here.

To me, this is a true hidden gem. I know that term gets abused quite a lot, but not a whole lot of people know about this one. Yet it's one of the most memorable 3D platformers I've played in awhile.

 
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

This was posted in December.

[–] [email protected] 98 points 4 days ago (25 children)

I’m not a Lemmy admin, but from what I’m seeing, there’s been an uptick of 4,000 Lemmy registrations within the last 24 hours.

There’s now 477,048 Lemmy accounts.

 

r/RetroGaming is very strict about retro. They say the Nintendo 64 is retro while the PlayStation 2 is modern. This despite the fact the PlayStation 2 is now 25 years old.

So I got to wonder about this community deems as “retro”.

Or a better question: what’s considered retro and not retro? What’s the fine line between retro and modern?