Thann

joined 3 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Pros: he's an idiot that will uncritically parrot any talking point we give him

Cons: he's an idiot that will uncritically parrot any talking point he finds

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Man I sure hate it when your dev teams spend all sprint developing a bug!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

They're really going to regret the wrist-slapp this time!

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (5 children)

So far all we know is she might do more than nothing

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

We need to consolidate so there will be more competition you see!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Either way your back is fucked

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

I remember when we had a "limited ground incursion" in Iraq and Afghanistan

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

Hello, can you be Bernie sanders please?

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because if they find any cash they will take it, even if there are no drugs!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah.... If your government is so poorly implemented you can't even maintain a mastodon instance, you probably have bigger problems....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

For something to be deleted on the fediverse you would need to have no instance and no followers lol

 

This is a semantic question, but I want to get a feel for what you guys think.

 

This famously complex experiment gets explained simply

 

A throwback to remind ourselves that apple is terrible for privacy

 
 

I've had this debate before and was unable to come to a conclusion. It seems to me that any criticism, no matter how valid, could be characterized as harassment.
What do you guys think?
Is there a heuristic for determining which one a statement is?
Does everything just exist on a continuum between the two?
Is this harassment?

view more: next ›