this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2022
1 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43788 readers
840 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've had this debate before and was unable to come to a conclusion. It seems to me that any criticism, no matter how valid, could be characterized as harassment.
What do you guys think?
Is there a heuristic for determining which one a statement is?
Does everything just exist on a continuum between the two?
Is this harassment?

all 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Are they the same thing?

Criticism can be harrasment, but harrasment does not nessecary be criticism.

I would imagine the line would be somewhere that concensus (sometimes in the form of the law) say it is. The target of the criticism alone would not be a good measure by itself (I could imagine large polluters would find protest against them harrasment a lot sooner than what the general public would think it is.).

Does the line then become visible when it targets individuals? I think it is a very interesting question.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

News-articles that don't cite primary-sources are BS

Criticism or harassment?