this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
4 points (70.0% liked)

Firefox

17602 readers
477 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

edited the heading of the question. I think most of us here are reasoning why more people are not using firefox (because it was the initial question), but none of that explains why it's actively losing marketshare.

I don't agree ideologically with Firefox management and am somewhat of a semi-conservative (and my previous posts might testify to that), I think Firefox browser is absolutely amazing! It's beautiful and it just feels good. It has awesome features like containers. It's better for privacy than any mainstream browser out there (even counting Brave here) and it has great integration between PC and Phone. It's open-source (unlike Chrome) and it supports a good chunk of extensions you would need.

This was about PC, but I believe even for Mobiles it looks great and it allows features like extensions (and I hear desktop extensions are coming to firefox android?), it's just a great ecosystem and it's available everywhere unlike most FOSS softwares.

So why is Firefox's market share dying?

I mean, I have a few ideas why it might be, maybe correct me I guess?

  1. Most people don't know how to use extensions well and how to use Firefox well. (Most of my friends in their 30's still live without ad blockers, so I don't think many are educated here)
  2. It's just not as fast as Chrome or Brave. I can't deny this, but despite of this, I find it's worthy.
  3. It's not the default.
  4. Many features which are Google specific aren't supported.
  5. Many websites are just not supporting firefox anymore (looking at you snapchat), but you would be right in saying this is the effect of Firefox losing it's market share not the cause (at least for now) and you would be right.

But what else?

I might take time (a lot of it) to get back at you, thanks for understanding.

occasionally I’ll find websites that don’t work 100% because they were coded primarily for chromium based browsers. FU Google

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've never experienced any slowness with Firefox, so I don't know what people are talking about. But Chrome is still the default browser on Android and I guess it's the major reason why people are installing Chrome on their computer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's improved a lot recently and even surpasses Chrome in some benchmarks, but it took them a really really long time to catch up with Chrome's speed.

Chrome split up web pages into their own processes very early on, while Firefox still had to mostly run things single threaded. That made a huge difference especially on laptops with 4-8 slow threads.

Chrome also turned to the GPU for acceleration really early on too. That's also something Firefox took a really long time to catch up with.

Like many, I've been on Chromium since the single digit days, and only switched back to Firefox in anticipation of the manifest v3 fiasco.

Chrome was just way too good to not use it. Chrome beat the shit out of Firefox the way Firefox beat the shit out of IE6 back then. It was so good I sucked up the lack of extensions or Flash Player support. It was faster to load ads than use Firefox to block them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because not only do you (the end user) have to go out of your way to get it, but you get spammed by Microsoft/Edge and Google/Chrome to install a "faster" and "more secure" browser. Additionally, on the mobile side, Apple is preventing all iPhone/iPad users from picking a real alternative browser that isn't just webkit re-skinned, putting half the population at a disadvantage and to their own corporate interests.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you mean about the apple part? I use FF on my iPhone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's uses safari's engine, which is the only one allowed by Apple. Doesn't matter what browser you download from the store.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Hashtag late but Firefox’s main downsides is that it’s tab flushing sucks compared to Edge, and there’s no native vertical tabs.

In Edge, if a tab is put to sleep, clicking it again does not require a full refresh. Why does it need to completely reload in Firefox?

I’m aware there’s extensions for tab groups and vertical tabs (I’m using Simple Tab Groups), but it should be a natively supported feature.

Add that to the fact that Firefox is now the web developer equivalent of IE6 circa 2010 - minuscule user base and requires weird hacks to get websites to look good on it - and you got a recipe for people not wanting to use it.

Also lying about being the privacy focused browser when it has a bunch of telemetry and a bundled sponsored extension I had to look up how to get rid of, that part sucks too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Firefox is not a worse browser, it's just the lack of visibility. You have to want to install Firefox to try it, the only exception I know it's in Linux where most of the time it's the default browser. Google Chrome, on the other hand, is promoted each time you search anything in Google without Google Chrome.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

On losing market share.

I truly appreciate all of the efforts Mozilla has brought, but there are things I cannot tolerate, and @[email protected] is accurate and concise, which I'd like to expound upon.

[Mozilla] spent twenty years burning out every committed advocate with broken extensions, UI whack-a-mole, random half-baked corporate decisions, [before finally mimicking Chrome.]

Firefox's user-base was mostly nerds, and nerds' grass-roots referrals; well and truly, Firefox was a developers first browser. What happens when you have many enthusiastic nerds contributing to a project? Free-ish improvements. You still need someone to review pushes, correct merge conflicts, implement requests, prioritize feedback, and maintain the playground after all.

However, Mozilla made some questionable and unilateral decisions that alienated their user-base. For the sake of brevity, I'll list some of the issues that caused me to switch to LibreWolf. Descending importance:

  • Deciding developers would no longer be the target audience. (History follows. 2020 a new CEO is appointed: Mitchell Baker. Mozilla announces funding cuts to various departments, such as MDN, developer tools, and security researchers. MDN slowly loses its status as the, 1, go-to web reference and, 2, place to find the latest advancements of the web. Dev tools in Chrome gain features FF can't keep up with. Earlier in May, of this year, 2023: Mozilla begins new developer blogs in an effort to regain the gold mine they discarded, along with various other measures.)

  • Installing the Mr. Robot extension without warning, let alone consent. (This was 6 years ago. I should let it go.)

  • Whitelisting only 6 mobile add-ons. (Add-on manager now announced to be "(re-)opened" later this year.)

  • Making it very difficult to opt-out of said mobile add-on decision, and impossible without opting-in to telemetry.

  • about:config unavailability in mobile Firefox.

  • Massive issues in major versions, which should've been caught by beta testing if not alpha.

My biggest gripes boil down to throwing us away, and the decisions made in pursuing generic and more profitable consumers. Mostly in removing the freedom, tinkering ability, control, etc that Firefox previously provided.

Ultimately, they have contributed greatly. I don't expect they quite understand how controlling and authoritarian decisions are driving away their hardest dying supporters, but I can hope they remember their roots. I hope they can learn and change. I'd like to get some faith back in the company I was such a large fan of. I wish them all the wisdom and success they can manage. If they go the way of Netscape, I hope some other idealist nerds pick up the torch.

I wish them well, but Firefox is no longer my browser.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Spent twenty years burning out every committed advocate with broken extensions, UI whack-a-mole, random half-baked corporate decisions, and finally just giving up and being "like Chrome but."

Meanwhile Google engages in blatant anti-competitive behavior to claw ever more market-share away from everything and everyone, and American politics are too much of a dumpster fire to stop them.

Literally the only other browsers that are other browsers are Firefox and Safari, and people only use Safari because iOS is a prison. iPhone users will insist their reskinned Safari webview is-too Firefox or Chrome or whatever, and then wonder why anyone makes a big deal about browsers when everything they've tried works exactly the same.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup. If I used iOS, I'd probably use Brave because it seems to be the only one with an ad blocker.

But I don't use iOS, so I use Firefox with an ad blocker installed, and I think it's great. But I can't really recommend mobile Firefox because many of my coworkers use iOS and that recommendation won't work for them.

So if someone asks what to use, I need to ask what platform they're on. And that sucks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Safari on iOS supports extensions as of the last couple years, and AdGuard is available for it. Works great!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Firefox does not have a way to force them into it.

  • ChromeOS - Chrome only. Default. Google.com beggs you to get an account and try Chrome. Android, comes with Android preinstalled.
  • Windows - Annoying Try Edge popup force them during boot. Bing Chat is Edge Only.
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Many Linux distributions include Firefox as a default browser, but GNU/Linux is not very popular on desktop either...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Firefox was long the No 2 browser, then Chrome came along at the time that Google was cool and they actually marketed it with TV ads. It looked cooler and more modern, it had some innovative features... Firefox never recovered

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I work in IT and had to abandon Firefox because of compatibility issues that came up on a regular basis. it appears companies are simply not using it as part of their QA anymore. Also, in general the GUI theming has issues for me with the font and distinguishing highlights with my crappy vision. I tried every theme out there and for some reason apparently people writing themes just don't care to make it so you can see what is highlighted and what is not. Even The default theme sucks in my opinion. There were a number of other nits that I just kept having issues with - getting prompted on eBay to verify my identity for no reason, repeatedly, which doesn't happen on chromium and stuff like that.

I wish Apple would adopt the Firefox rendering engine and take Safari cross platform. It would give Firefox a fighting chance at the overall market.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why make the effort to switch to Firefox, if the browser that came installed with your device works?

Or, more realistically, people don't even grok the concept of a web browser.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Bingo. We live in the smartphone era where the average user cannot differentiate between facebook (the app) and internet (the web).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I didn't find the performance gap really high when I switched from Chromium to Firefox. Even on my shitty old laptop, Firefox works fine. I have to admit though that it uses way too much memory.

I do agree with your 3rd point though. History has taught us that defaults matter a lot. Firefox isn't a default anywhere apart from linux distros and FirefoxOS was a failure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
  1. It's actually faster than Chromium in recent build benchmarks. Firefox runs JS faster.
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'd guess that:

  • Google is a bigger brand that attracts many people as a lot of them are already using some of the company's products
  • These other products are well integrated with the browser: browser history is shared across devices along with passwords and extensions
  • Google advertises Chrome in the Google Search, it's a default search engine even in Firefox

Most people are not tech savvy and/or privacy-oriented.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Firefox is kinda like Linux in my opinion. Yes, some games might not run on linux and some games don't run as good as on windows, but most run just fine. But since I don't use windows I don't know the difference and so I don't care about it either. Same thing with firefox, chrome might do x better, but then I have not used it in years so I just don't care about it. Blissful ignorance I suppose? Either way I am happy with linux and firefox since both have not only downsides, but plenty advantages too in my opinion.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I do not see any killer feature of Firefox right now. Even the Mozilla's official browser comparison site indicates Microsoft Edge being on par with Firefox, based on Mozilla's own criteria!
This will change in the future. Firefox will be the only major web browser on Android with full-fledged addon support.
I am already using some extensions on Vivaldi (like Consent-o-Matic, some transliteration addons), but this could make me switch to Firefox.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The killer feature is cookie containers, aka no cross site tracking by default.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I actually switched away from Firefox to Vivaldi a few months ago mainly for 2 reasons.

  1. Firefox's profiles are dogshit. They are almost a hidden feature and are very cumbersome to use.

  2. The Android browser support for certain types of extensions is dodgy. Using uBlock Origin delays the loading of all webpages by a few seconds for some reason. There is a Github issue about this that has been open for a few years now.

I want the browser I use to be on both Android and desktop. Vivaldi has been OK so far.

I do miss a lot of the good stuff from Firefox, especially their address bar. For some reason I find it much better than anything on Chromium based browsers. Firefox's is much snappier and is correct with it's suggestions the majority of the time.

I also like Firefox's sync between devices to be much better.

When those 2 issues are resolved I will come back, but as it stands now it's a hassle for my needs.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

you can use profiles easily by creating shortcuts with the flag --profile xyz

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

For me it's a silly issue, they don't let me customize my homepage and let set extensions like tabliss on homepage on android such a basic feature yet not available also external download manager implementation on android is horrible

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

UI is worse, performance is mostly a bit slower, the morals seem cloudy sometimes.
and.. the biggest one: PEOPLE ARE APATHETIC

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Thank Mozilla for this. They're too busy with other shit and between feature removals and crappy UI changes, they've managed to loose a huge amount of users. I used to be one of them. Now I wouldn't touch FF with a 10 feet pole. I simply refuse to give Mozilla more visibility.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, what browser did you switch to?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

First Vivaldi, then Brave.

Now, let's the insults begin.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Brave is niet zo braaf als die kuthond die jij bent

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Non ho capito una beata minchia. Scrivi in inglese.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I install chrome on a computer and log in, I'm immediately connected to my calendar, email, cloud storage, remote desktop, documents, and my login info is synced floor all the other things I do and will auto login for me on a large number of those sites. In short it saves me a crazy amount of time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You can do pretty much the same thing with Firefox: you sign in to Firefox to sync your passwords and browser settings, then (assuming you're talking about Google calendar, Gmail, etc.) You can sign into your Google account with one click. That's not really any less convenient.

Besides, I've hardly ever heard of anyone moving away from Firefox to Chrome, so I doubt the reason is any sort of convenience or design superiority. I'd attribute it to the fact that most people who already use the Internet (pretty much everyone) has already settled on a browser, with chrome-based browsers being the most common. So anyone new to the Internet will just choose the favorite as the default. This is especially true considering they most new Internet users are probably kids, so they're not aware of concerns about privacy, monocultures, DRM, etc. that would drive someone to pick Firefox.

Basically, it's not that Chrome is actually better than Firefox. I think it's that the market is growing, and the most common browsers will grow more quickly than Firefox simply for the sake of familiarity.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One reason is that if you use Gmail, every two weeks appears a "y u no use chrome" nag popup that can't be permanently dismissed

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If I’ve ever seen this message, I don’t remember it. Crazy what uBlock Origin can do for one’s peace of mind.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Firefox on android is terrible. The UI is awful (how hard is to create a usable bookmark system?) and forced opening a new tab are my two pet peeves. Also, it is much, much slower than a chromium based browser in my experience and seems to take a lot more memory. Also, occasionally I'll find websites that don't work 100% because they were coded primarily for chromium based browsers. FU Google.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The UI is awful (how hard is to create a usable bookmark system?)

agree to disagree, it's one of the best. What do you use that's better?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I don’t use anything else. I don’t like the long list of folders that doesn’t clearly show the tree hierarchy, ie. I can’t easily identify the child/parent relationship. The visual difference between parent and child is too minimal for my eyes. I realize it’s subjective but I really don’t like it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Declining market share and dying are not at all the same thing. Remember that FOSS can survive without resources tha M$ and ABC have.

Anyway, what do you mean you're conservative? I don't understand at all. What values pushed you to what browsers? Laziness and defaults, maybe, but that's a different position.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

what do you mean you're conservative?

He means "waah waah! They're oppressing me by not agreeing with me!!!" Conservatives hate the consequences of their actions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Hey there now. BoTh SiDeS tHo /s

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Eh, even as someone who on a global political scale is left leaning, I've been hesitant to donate to Mozilla. I'd love to support the browser development, but the fact that they siphon off money from that to support political activities and organizations (especially when some of them are downright corrupt, like BLM) turns me off from that.

When I want to donate to a political organization, I'll do that directly. What I want Mozilla to do, most of all, is keep firefox (and by extension gecko) alive, and thereby maintain internet freedom.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maintaining a browser for the modern web is a massive undertaking that needs funding.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ever since the first release, I've tried Firefox a few times. Each time I was left with a feeling of needing dozens of extensions to get it up to par with the browser I was using at the time (mainly Opera and now Vivaldi). The extensions I found were never customisable enough, and would often break and/or be abandoned after a while.

Don't get me wrong: Chrome, IE, Edge, and Safari are worse - each time I used them I got the urge to throw my computer out the window after just a few minutes. But Firefox is just not customisable enough to my liking, and extension are IMO not the answer.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm curious, what is missing from Firefox compared to Vivaldi according to you?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Note that since I don't use Firefox some of these may actually be available, but I don't know about them.

  • Mouse gestures.
  • A status bar that stays on screen.
  • The ability to select part of a link's text.
  • Tab stacking.
  • Tab tiling.
  • Opening a link in either a foreground or background tab. This is available as a toggle in the settings only.
  • Ad block.
  • Spatial navigation.
  • Customisable keyboard shortcuts for pretty much everything.

These are the ones that matter to me, there are more that I don't personally use.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Firefox on Android removed the feature to open local html files. No, I'm not interested in running a webserver on a phone for local files lol.

Switched to Vivaldi.