Could all YouTubers everywhere please emulate this guy's style... no obnoxious edits, no "destroying" someone else's point of view.... he just calmly and methodically explains what he's done and what the issues are.
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
No because it requires certain character traits they don't have.
And children won't watch it.
I wouldn't think optimizing solar systems is something a child would watch, anyway. Not all YouTube content has to water itself down to try to capture the child market, the are plenty of adults using the website too.
I do see your point though absolutely, I'm just sick of potentially interesting videos being ruined by trying to appeal to every single age demographic under the sun, haha :-P
I think these types of solar projects are something an older child could do, at least with a little adult supervision to make sure that don't blind or burn themselves
And so it has 2k views. sigh
I did WHAT?? To solve the energy crisis? :O (gone SEXUAL)
Complete with 20,000 :0 faces
The obnoxious crap gets more clicks and views. It happens because we, the audience, reinforce it.
the platforms still love boosting it for engagement no matter how much I ignore it
Yeah that's true, but you can avoid the algorithm by sticking to your "Subscriptions" page in YouTube. Or by using NewPipe or another alternative front end.
i use invidious nowadays and its quite good if you dont mind instances going down every once in a while
If you watch one of his previous videos you can literally see bombing/hear in the distance
I saw "Ukrainian" and "Solar focusing system" and immediately thought
"SOMEONE CALL JAMIE AND ADAM THE MAD LADS ON THE DNIPRO FINALLY MADE THE FUCKING DEATH RAY!"
When the Hawaiian fires happened people were saying the Chinese had that as a weapon and were using it on America, I noticed.
A solar concentrator.
The collected thermal energy can then be conducted into a working fluid whose thermal expansion can be leveraged to push pistons which crank a driveshaft (like a steam engine) or blast in high pressure jets through rotor blades (such as a turbine). This rotary kinetic motion can then turn a generator.
It's also possible to set up a thermocouple to generate voltage. It doesn't pack a lot of 'oomph' but it's allegedly low maintenance, and only as unreliable as the weather is (instead of creating additional unreliability on top of weather fluctuations.)
Means exist to store the thermal energy in a well insulated 'reservoir' containing of a large volume of some working fluid with a high thermal capacity and bleeding that thermal energy out as needed, but ... well... heat is already waste. my gut can be very wrong but nevertheless my gut still tells me that if i want to store energy that is collected as heat, it is not ideal to leave it as heat, because heat is waste and heat dissipates. The impulse I have is to try to convert it to another form of potential energy that has some kind of metastable storage state. I mean shit, even if it's hoisting a heavy object to the top of a slope so i can extract the kinetic energy as it rolls back down, the heavy object at the top of that slope isn't going to rapidly cease to exist before my eyes just because i left it alone; as long as it's chocked and secured, it will be ready to roll (literally) when I need it to and not before (brooking some direct physical disruption).
so... big fuckin batteries, or that prodigious concentrated heat can be used to thermally depolymerize some organic waste like plastic to turn it into a slurry of monomers that can be refined into a synthetic internal combustion fuel. Or a shit ton of compressed air in a tank, i dunno. Because batteries aren't very easy for someone to just cobble together out of consumer grade materials but most hardware stores have compressed air tanks available and shit.
Keeping the energy thermal avoids a conversion step, and hence one area of inefficiency, especially as we use a lot of our energy for heating. There's been some interesting progress on heat batteries which would pair well with a solar concentrator.
The funny thing is, converting to electricity and running a heat pump can be more efficient than simply using the heat, as long as the outside temperature is not too low
Air transfer heat pumps just seem like poor planning to me. Ground or groundwater heat sink is so much better. Some initial expense when building a house but works forever.
Air medium heat pumps: Let's heat the house to 70F using 20F air Let's cool the house to 70F using 110F air
Groundwater medium heat pumps: Let's heat the house to 70F using 60F groundwater when it's 20F out Let's cool the house to 70F using 60F groundwater when it's 110F out
Forever lol. Those ground installs need to be replaced at least every 20 years with new drilling. Air to water heat pump is way nicer when you have the space.
Yet it's still more efficient than using the heat directly to heat
It's because the sand is at 600c which would wreak havoc if you had water pumping through the tubing. Air is cheaper to do handle at those temperatures.
Wow that's some cool tech, cheap simple and you can store heat for months.
Extremely interesting!
You make some good points but heat can be stored as thermal mass. The losses in converting the solar heat into another type of energy storage like batteries negates simply storing it in a large vat of sand for example.
the kinds of lovely insights i can usually find on lemmy 💜
Heat isn't waste. It's considered waste in a lot of situations because it's a byproduct that is sometimes difficult to get rid of, but that doesn't make it inherently useless.
Otherwise I agree that it's maybe not the most intuitive type of energy storage but if those large solar-thermal power plants use it to generate power throughout the night there's gotta be something to it. I imagine it's also something that scales well because the area grows slower than the volume.
hoisting a heavy object to the top of a slope
in a Missouri USA they pump water up a hill then drain it back when demand increases, it's a rather large system. In Al'Abama an individual is using underground salt water tanks to store hot an cold salt water for HVAC and electric on his farm.
personally.... I use solar electric to drive a 10k/btu AC and scavenge the unit's waste heat as a food dehydrator, storing food is also storing solar energy and the AC keeps is pleasant indoors.
Note: Haven't actually read the article, but in general the idea of heat storage is a tried and true energy storage method.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/watch?v=DDjijUx13sc
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Good bot!