this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
174 points (97.8% liked)

Casual Conversation

3281 readers
200 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It feel like a bad unreal dream. I am honestly concerned and scared.

top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

It's strange, or? Where we normal people are trying to get on with our lives, our government decides to wage war with some other country, where normal people are also just trying to get on with their lives.

No one wants war, besides people selling missiles, bombs, tanks, guns, etc

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are far more that want war. Even people that would have nothing to gain but everything to lose from a war.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Send them to the front and let the problem solve itself.

The issue lies with where the sentiment comes from. Most of the time it originates from politicians who, unable to solve local problems, choose to demonize a part of society or another country in order to get away with their failures and the riches/power this enables them to grab.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

As part of the constitution that was imposed on them when the US rebooted their government following WWII, Japan can't activate its military except in self defense.

Their politicians have been complaining about that and trying to get rid of it for decades now, but in my opinion every country should have such a provision. Any sane politician claims they wouldn't use the military unless someone else attacked first, so why give them the option at all?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Well, we see plenty of examples of "self defense" being proclaimed rather broadly. For instance Germany justified its participation in the NATO occupation of Afghanistan as "defending our freedom at the Hindu Kush", because there is a self defense provision in the constitution. Otherwise creating some false-flag to justify "self defense" is also a standard tactic employed since centuries if not millennia.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

From a solely pessimistic point of view, you're right to be scared. This is a war between two nuclear powers and it can get real ugly in the worst case scenario.

But as long as it's kept a strategic war focused on border bickerings and damaging each other's economic ability, civilians should be safe in the most part.

I'd recommend channeling the fear into activism towards peace. If you are willing and able, get together with others and pressure your government with large protests against the war. If not, then stay safe.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Civilians live at the borders too though

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

I hope you and your loved ones stay safe and well.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

I'm sorry this is happening to you. There's too much war in the world and not enough leaders that act responsibly. Hope you stay safe, internet stranger-friend.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

May I ask where in India you live?

A don't really have a whole lot of insight or comforting words, but I have to admit that my scandinavian ass is leaning towards "It's not the first time. Cooler heads tend to prevail"

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Capital of India:Delhi. No too far away or close to the border. But it's capital so yeah I am scared.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Was there a formal declaration? Was there escalation? Just trying to understand what changed since yesterday

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not yet, but seemingly Pak is interested in escalations.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Yes, I am sure Pakistan is dying to participant in a full blown out war. You are so right dude.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

India bombed their country. "Pak" either goes to war or they keep doing it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Wish you a lot of strength and hope you stay safe! It’s understandable that you’re concerned and scared, as this is a dangerous situation. Wish I could say anything else but just want you to know that I hope this will be over soon and cause no more suffering or losses.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Always thought WW3 would be the USA russia or china launching the first nuke.. hope these two knuckleheads can keep their radioactive dicks in their pants so the rest of the world doesnt go down with them..

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Interestingly, India-Pakistan war was one of the top WWIII scenarios mentioned in the movie War Games (1983) - #8: https://ww31987.wordpress.com/2022/03/05/wargames-joshuas-nuclear-war-scenarios-1-59/

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Would a nuclear exchange between these two countries drag the rest of the nuclear powers into the conflict?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Who knows? I figure wars often lead to unexpected results.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

China sure won't sit by while people are lobbing nukes at countries on their borders.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

They're not NATO countries, so I doubt it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Been 25 years since the last one, ask China to stop paying them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Sorry for you 😔

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ugh, I'm sorry. It feels like the whole world is coming apart at the seams. My country did some terrible things recently, but I hope we will all trend in a better direction soon.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

There really are very few governments today that inspire hope for the future. Everywhere politicians all seem to be focused on short-term personal enrichment and staying in power by appealing to their people's lowest urges. If we get through this period, it will be in spite of our leaders not because of them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

We're all here for you every step of the way.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Good luck, im sending you strength and courage for the times to come. As others may have said, you might want to look for communities and association, and people in general : solidarity can be crucial in hard times

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I’m so sorry to hear this/see this unfolding on the global stage. Would love to hear more of your thoughts on this, if you’re willing to share

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

आपने दिल्ली का ज़िक्र किया, इसलिए हिंदी में लिख रही हूँ।

घबराहट जायज़ है, पर कोई बात नहीं। मै उत्तर भारत की निवासी नहीं हूँ, तो मै आपकी परिस्थिति नहीं समझ सकती हूँ, पर यह पहली बार नहीं की जंग की घोषणा हुई है। खबरिया चैनलों से दूर रहिये, आपके ज़ेहनी सेहत के लिए अच्छी नहीं है। उन्हें इंसानियत की कोई कदर नहीं है। यह भी गुज़र जायेगा। वैसे भी हमारी वायु सेना सब कुछ रोक रही है। आख़िर, "वक़्त रहता नहीं कही टिक कर, आदत इसकी भी आदमी सी है।" -गुलज़ार