this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
174 points (97.8% liked)

Casual Conversation

3281 readers
202 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It feel like a bad unreal dream. I am honestly concerned and scared.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So you're just discussing in bad faith here. How the hell do you know the CEO (or the management) "wants" war but does not want to "provoke war"? Are you a mind reader?

Or are you one of those people thinking we shouldn't have an army?

I also notice the "USA BAD" bias, what about russia, they do want war and provoke it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mate I'm Estonian, Russia is bad by default, it doesn't even need discussion. You don't think Russian military industry CEOs and owners didn't cream their pants when Putin invaded Ukraine again? Chemezov is super happy about it for one, he's also very happy that western companies are no longer competing with him on the Russian market.

The CEOs of military industrial companies, like any other CEOs, are going to make more money if the company's numbers are better. If a war happening in bumfuck nowhere doubles the Christmas bonus of one of those bloodsuckers, you bet they'll cheer for it. It's not like war affects them personally. And it's hella fucking profitable.

I'm not anti military spending, I'm anti capitalists profiting from bloodshed. Military industry shouldn't be profitable. It should be nationalised.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm swedish so I know the history.

I just hate this stupid fearmongering about military spending. We should spend more nowadays, so this whole narrative that some hidden kabal is provoking wars is just bad for everyone IMO. And yes it's disgusting that CEOs gets bonuses because they sell more weapons, but we want them to make them so that we can buy them, it's IMO not the other way around.

It's absolutely what putin would love BTW, "lets shut down those war hawks' businesses!" narrative.

But I think you and I might be on the same side when it comes down to it, or so I feel.

Cheers and fuck russia

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I'm not against either of our countries increasing military spending either, I'm just disgusted that a bunch of people are getting rich off people dying. Hence my idea that weapons manufacturing should be a public industry, not a for-profit one. European nations could still collaborate too. Not everyone needs to make everything.