Technology

I was under the impression that even clearly drawn it's already illegal, though it's a grey area since they can say "lol it's a 1000 year old demon that just looks like a child." Is that not the case?

This sort of reminds myself on the discussion on "what is a women". Is Siri a women? Many might say so, but t the same time Siri is not even human.

The question on how old the person on a specific generated image might be and if it even depicts a person at all, can only be answered through society. There is no scientific or any logical answer for this.

So this will always have grey areas and differing opinions and can be rulings in different cultures.

In the end it is about discussions about ethics not logic.

if you have a soup of all liquids and a sieve that only lets coffee and ice cream through it produces coffee ice cream (metaphor, don't think too hard about it)

that's how gen ai works. each step sieves out raw data to get closer to the prompt.

Pictures of clothed children and naked adults.

Nobody trained them on what things made out of spaghetti look like, but they can generate them because smushing multiple things together is precisely what they do.

I think it would boost the market for the real thing more.

It's possible that there are people that would become into AI generated CP if it was just allowed to be advertised on nsfw website.

And that would lead some to seek out the real thing. I think it's best to condemn it entirely

I don't like saying the full phrase, it's a disgusting merger of words that shouldn't exist.