this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
254 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

68187 readers
3850 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I don't like saying the full phrase, it's a disgusting merger of words that shouldn't exist.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

FYI, the current accepted term is csam. Children sexual abuse material. The reason why CP is wrong is that porn implies, or should imply, that there's consent on the sexual act, and children cannot consent.

You are right, it's a disgusting merger exactly because it implies something that's absolutely incorrect and wrong.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If we are pedantic, I'm not sure if "children cannot consent" is correct. Children at 16 are mature enough to give consent in legal context, we as a society just frown upon older adults mingling with them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

When I was 16 I would have totally posed for porn and I would have been completely consenting. But it would have been illegal. I wonder where we should draw the line, and if the current one is the best one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

buddy, theres a whole range of ages between 0 and 16, and i use that number 0 advisedly.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Legally speaking children can't consent, which is why it's illegal and the basis of my statement. I wasn't being pedantic, I was showing a new terminology.

Different legislations have different consent ages, but in the internet we should go by the highest one since anything can be viewed from anywhere.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Very true, thanks for your sensitivity @dumbass

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Wow so its from the duh region in france, here I thought it was just sparkling dumbass

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Nope, it's the fully alcoholic dumbass, not that shitty grape juice variety!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

and it's wrong, too. it's not pornography, it's rape.