this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
371 points (99.2% liked)

News

28120 readers
3232 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The massive changes in US research brought about by the new administration of President Donald Trump are causing many scientists in the country to rethink their lives and careers. More than 1,200 scientists who responded to a Nature poll — three-quarters of the total respondents — are considering leaving the United States following the disruptions prompted by Trump. Europe and Canada were among the top choices for relocation.

The trend was particularly pronounced among early-career researchers. Of the 690 postgraduate researchers who responded, 548 were considering leaving; 255 of 340 PhD students said the same.

I have answered this poll myself; this is meant for scientists of all career-stages, so a lot of PhD students and postdocs along with faculty members.

I don't think the article is paywalled, but let me know if it is.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 67 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The article was not paywalled, also I think the term we like to use for this phenomenon is “brain drain.”

The climate research community has been gutted by what’s happening with the US government. NOAA and NWS collected some of the most important and valuable data in the world for this and now that’s pretty much over. It will take decades to undo what has been done in only a few months and I’m being hopeful.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 3 days ago (3 children)

We dont have decades left to act on climate. Unfortunately, this could be our nail in the coffin on this iteration of society.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The science doesn't matter anyway, if it did, and this wasn't just about money and politics, countries like Canada wouldn't be charging a carbon tax, driving up prices for Canadians making them more poor which science says makes them worse polluters. Instead we would be shipping natural gas to India and China to phase out their coal consumption. We'd be using pipelines to cut carbons emissions from transportation vehicles. We would be using tax dollars to install solar on people's homes for them, reducing infrastructure maintenance and upgrade requirements for line and roads.

It's not about the science. It never was. That's why we are all doomed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I wish we lived in a world where you weren't right about this. But you are, it was never about science.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 days ago (3 children)

That ship may have already sailed before this administration took over, but my hope was that society could restructure itself in a way that would still sustain human life. At this point we may even be on an extinction track if nothing changes. The world is chaotic enough at 1.5C. I shutter to imagine a world at 4C.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

We've already avoided 4C based on current trends.

This is because the world is rapidly pivoting to renewables, simply because they're so much cheaper and better than the alternatives. It will be almost impossible to reverse that trend even with the damage the Trump admin will do.

Don't get me wrong, we still have a LOT of work to do, but the situation is not hopeless. The number one spreaders of climate doomerism right now are oil and gas companies. They want you to despair, so that you'll give up on trying to change things. In reality a lot of climate trends are already swinging in positive directions simply because of the economics. That on its own is not enough, and we'll never solve a market driven problem with market solutions, but it's a start.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But poor brown people suffer those consequences, so who cares? /s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Geriatric fucks really think the rich countries will magically be fine ...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

At 4C we aren't getting out of this hellhole. The resource wars already seem to be drawing their lines now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is not how climate science works.

Everything we're doing is "later than we should have done it", but nothing is ever "too late to make a difference."

The climate isn't a lightswitch, and it's not a bomb with a count down timer. Everything we do to improve the situation reduces the amount of total suffering that will result from anthropogenic climate change.

The notion that there is a point of no return beyond which our efforts are useless is very popular... With oil and gas executives. The "It's too late" message is being pushed heavily by people who want to keep polluting.

In reality, it's like getting into a car crash. Even if you brake too late to avoid the impact, braking still reduces the severity of the impact. Everything we do to reduce our carbon impact (as a species) will save lives. We are past the point of avoiding any harm at all, but we can still reduce the harm that occurs and hasten the point where we begin to restore our climate to a healthy state.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah my point is we have 4 years of an EPA thats gonna let everything be dumped into the environment. We can't afford to go backwards right now. We aren't getting into a crashing car and just not braking, we're smashing the accelerator is the problem. Trump is gonna fuck the environment by repealing any and all regulation with that "special help line". And yeah, it will probably just be US that turns into a toxic dump. But it will still suck.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yes, it will suck, and people will die as a result. A lot of people. We're still not remotely prepared for the scale of human misery climate change is going to inflict.

But it's important to be clear about the distinction between "This will make things much, much worse" and "This will destroy any chance of things getting better."

The latter is the message oil and gas execs want you to be spreading. Don't do their dirty work for them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

We needed to be prosecuting the biggest polluters 30 years ago. Now they are prosecuting climate supporters, literally the opposite of what we need. Countries are turning to autocracy. The UK is arresting climate protestors. Its just not looking like its going to get better. And its definitely not getting better in the US where I reside.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 days ago

I hope things improve here in the US, but at some point there's really nothing else to do but leave. There's a point where the US simply becomes a lost cause. I don't know if we're there yet, but I don't feel like things are heading in the right direction.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Thanks.

~ Europe

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Thank you, Trump!

Your brain drain is Europe's gain.

Not your personal brain drain... that one happened during gestation.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Are Canada and EU countries opening their arms welcomely to science refugees?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Canada sucks ass for science funding unfortunately.

Domestic grad students have the privilege of living off a ~24k/year stipend throughout their programs which is literally below the poverty line. Keep in mind science grad students are putting in >40h weeks in the lab while also trying to have a semblance of a normal life outside of that

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sadly, not quite: several countries want to, but they all have their own funding difficulties. They are trying to though, since these days American scientists might be seen as being offered at a steep discount

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

Will science for food and, if you can spare it, shelter.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

It's gonna be rough but I for one welcome EU to make use of USA's mistakes. Just need to make sure that populism doesn't gain any more foothold here.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

One of the frustrating things is the people responsible for this brain drain, the conservative idiots, will never really suffer for this. Not in a way they understand.

If we get through this, every conservative needs to go up against the wall.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And what would keep conservatism from sprouting once again in this scenario?

Conservatism is not the issue; the issue is capitalism. Put the capitalists against the wall.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

I don't know if that's exactly a Venn diagram that's a circle, but I think if you lose all the conservatives you also lose the capitalists. Whoever you'd have left would be amenable to change.