this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
92 points (91.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54500 readers
363 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

First off, I'd normally ask this question on a datahoarding forum, but this one is way more active than those and I'm sure there's considerable overlap.

So I have a Synology DS218+ that I got in 2020. So it's a 6 year old model by now but only 4 into its service. There's absolutely no reason to believe it'll start failing anytime soon, and it's completely reliable. I'm just succession planning.

I'm looking forward to my next NAS, wondering if I should get the new version of the same model again (whenever that is) or expand to a 4 bay.

The drives are 14 TB shucked easy stores, for what it's worth, and not even half full.

What are your thoughts?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The NAS itself will likely outlive the drives inside, just the nature of things. Hard drives follow a sort of curve when it comes to failure, most fail either immediately or in a few 10000 hours of run time. Other factors include the drives being too hot, the amount of hard power events, and vibration.

Lots of info on drive failure can be found on Backblaze's Drive stat page. I know you have shucked drives, these are likely white label WD Red drives which are close to the 14TB WD drive backblaze uses.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Yeah they're reds. Is there a way I can check how many hours they have on them? 10,000 is just over a year. They're a couple years old now.

I'm not too concerned about them failing, I can afford to replace one without notice and they're mirrored. And backed up in some other easy stores.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

smartctl

But 10.000 seems on the low side, i have 4 datacenter toshiba 10tb disks with 40k hours and expect them to do at least 80k, but you can have bad luck and one fails prematurely.
If its within warranty, you can get it replaced, if not, tough luck.

Always have stuff protected in raid/zfs and backed up if you value the data or dont want a weekend ruined because you now have to reinstall.
And with big disks, consider having more disks as redundancy as another might get a bit-error while restoring the failed one. (check the statistical averages of the disk in the datasheet)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

I wouldn't start worrying until 50k+ hours.

There should be a way to view SMART info and that includes an hour count.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

That info can be found in the smart data for the drives, but I didn't mean 10,000 hours, more like > 50,000

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I've got a 12TB Seagate desktop expansion which contains a Seagate ironwolf drive. According to the link you shared, I'll better look for a backup drive asap.

Edit: the ones in the backblaze reference are all exos models, but i still have no profounf trust in Seagate.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes, according to their historical data Seagate drives appear to be on the higher side of failure rates. I've also experienced it myself, my Seagate drives have almost always failed before my WD drives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Mine aren't even on the list :(

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago (4 children)

My Synology NAS was running for 6+ years before I replaced it last year. And the only reason I replaced it was to upgrade the hardware to be able to act more like a home server running some more demanding services.

I've since given the NAS away to a friend who is still running it... As always back up your data just in case, but I wouldn't expect the hardware to crap out on you too soon

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Oh, I don't need to back it up because I have two drives running in RAID.

😜

[–] [email protected] 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Protip: The 'B' is RAID stands for "backup".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

As others have said, you should really be careful treating your RAID as a backup. I for one do all of my backing up on Playstation 1 memory cards... I had to buy a couple storage containers to store them all, but I guess that technically counts as off-site

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Dude, it was a joke. I've heard the advice a million times

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

RAID 0 naturally

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Same here. Last year I upgraded from a DS214+ and it was still running great. The only reason I upgraded to the DS220+ was so I could run docker containers.

I sold it for $200 which meant I ran it for 9 years for about $57 a year (CAD). I'm hoping to get even better bang for the buck with the new unit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

With a free os: indefinitely

With a proprietary os: hope and pray the maker doesn't discontinue it tomorrow

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Your NAS will last as long as your storage medium.

HDD lasts 5-10 years, SSD lasts like 10+

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Imho there's no reason to change or upgrade if your current setup works and you're satisfied with it. Keep your money, you'll see what the market has to offer when you need it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean, I was bored at work yesterday so started browsing. This is more of a thought experiment than anything.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

That's what I always tell myself too.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

I had a Drobo 5N for over 10 years. It lasted longer than the company itself.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

I've bought a Synology DS415+ back in December 2014. So it just turned 9 and it's still kicking. (Even with the C2000 fix.)

Although Synology stopped delivering updates, I'll keep it as long as it does what I need it to. However, my next device will be a TerraMaster where I'll install OMV on. Can't get a NAS with custom OS in a smaller form factor.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'd say 6-12 years. Maybe including about 1 hard disk failing. I forgot what the mean to failure is for a harddisk. And in a decade I probably have all the disks filled to the brim, my usage pattern changed and a new one has 10x the network speed, 4x more storage and is way faster in every aspect.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I had my DS213+ for a bit over 10 years, with no failures of any kind, just a bit of drive swapping for more storage space. Finally upgraded last year to a 4-bay with better performance and Docker support, but I would have kept using the old one otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

What do you mean by "last"? I know it's a common term, but when you dig deeper, you'll see why it doesn't really make sense. For this discussion, I'm assuming you mean "How long until I need to buy a newer model?"

First, consider the reasons you might have for buying a newer model. The first is hardware failure. Second is obsolescence - the device cannot keep up with newer needs, such as speed, capacity, or interface. The third is insecurity/unsupported from the vendor.

The last one is easy enough to check from a vendor's product lifecycle page. I'll assume this isn't what you're concerned about. Up next is obsolescence. Obviously it meets your needs today, but only you can predict your future needs. Maybe it's fine for a single 1080p* stream today, and that's all you use it for. It will continue to serve that purpose forever. But if your household grows and suddenly you need 3x 4k streams, it might not keep up. Or maybe you'll only need that single 1080p stream for the next 20 years. Maybe you'll hit drive capacity limits, or maybe you won't. We can't answer any of that for you.

That leaves hardware failure. But electronics don't wear out (mechanical drives do, to an extent, but you asked about the NAS). They don't really have an expected life span in the same way as a car battery or an appliance. Instead, they have a failure rate. XX% fail in a given time frame. Even if we assume a bathtub curve (which is a very bold assumption), the point where failures climb is going to be very unclear. The odds are actually very good that it will keep working well beyond that.

Also of note, very few electronics fail before they are obsolete.

*Technically it's about bitrate, but let's just ignore that detail for simplicity. We'll assume that 4k uses 4x as much space as 1080p

TL;DR: It could fail at any moment from the day it was manufactured, or it could outlast all of us. Prepare for that scenario with a decent backup strategy, but don't actually replace it until needed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

As I can't predict the future I believe you should juice it until the last drop, that way at least if it fails you wouldn't regret it.. pray&luck 🙏🤞

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I’m still running a DS414 filled with WD Red drives. I’ve only swapped out one of the drives as it was starting to have issues. I’ve considered upgrading for more features (Docker, Home Assistant etc) but can’t justify the expense just for “nice to have” instead of “need”. Realistically it only stores Linux ISOs that I get with Download Station.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah, performance is not an issue for me. I stream some Linux ISOs and so do a few friends. Pihole, photos backup, documents backup. That's about it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I just recently upgraded from my 2 bay NAS, simply because I ran out of storage and attaching more drives via USB just seemed silly at this point (I was already at 5).

I now have a DS2422+ 12 bay with 6x 20TB plates. And I very much expect the NAS to last past 10 years. HDDs can be added and replaced if you have raid setup. Not very feasible in 2 bay NAS.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

I'd be more concerned about the longevity of the drives than any NAS itself. I moved from commercial NAS appliances to a self-built one. It turns out that they cost about the same (depending on the hardware configuration you end up choosing, evidently), but are MUCH better performance-wise.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Using unraid is nice because you can keep replacing drives with lawyer ones as you need, or adding new drives to the array. It’s very flexible that way, despite some of its shortcomings.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (7 children)

What about building your own NAS? If you've the time / skills you can pick a very small micro ITX motherboard and a NAS case and build your own. This way you can run open-source software and it will have more features / expandability and potentially last way longer.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Do you have any examples of a NAS case? I'm looking at possibilities for redoing my setup which is currently an old Ryzen PC stuffed with 9 or so drives running Windows, SnapRAID, and DrivePool. I'd love to scale it down horsepower wise to make it more efficient and reliable (Windows sucks for this) along with separating it from my general PC usage. Some sort of 8-bay drive enclosure that can directly connect to a thin client PC, and handle different capacity drives (6TB-14TB) would be ideal.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I had a DS212j for about 10 years before I replaced it, and it was working just fine, so I sold it on ebay. It just couldn't keep up with the transcoding plex that I was using it for. Heck, 7 of those years it was running on a shelf in my garage getting covered in dust, and spiderwebs.

I imagine a + model will last even longer than that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

My 212j is still running fine, if you can call its level of performance “fine” in any way

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I've had my Synology DS215 for almost ten years. I've recently thought about replacing it, but I don't really see the benefit. I'll just replace the drives some time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Still running a ds210+ i bought second hand about 8 years ago.... Hosts a website and downloads torrents.. Not much else. Think it's about time i upgraded.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

The NAS will most likely outlive the software support and by far the HDDs you are putting in them.

load more comments
view more: next ›