this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
547 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

66783 readers
4859 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Half of LLM users (49%) think the models they use are smarter than they are, including 26% who think their LLMs are “a lot smarter.” Another 18% think LLMs are as smart as they are. Here are some of the other attributes they see:

  • Confident: 57% say the main LLM they use seems to act in a confident way.
  • Reasoning: 39% say the main LLM they use shows the capacity to think and reason at least some of the time.
  • Sense of humor: 32% say their main LLM seems to have a sense of humor.
  • Morals: 25% say their main model acts like it makes moral judgments about right and wrong at least sometimes. Sarcasm: 17% say their prime LLM seems to respond sarcastically.
  • Sad: 11% say the main model they use seems to express sadness, while 24% say that model also expresses hope.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Remember that 54% of adults in American cannot read beyond a 6th grade level, with 21% being fully illiterate.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 minutes ago

I will do you one better, HOW THE FUCK?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

Our education system in the USA is so bad. 😔

[–] [email protected] 3 points 37 minutes ago

Good thing we nuked the Dept of Ed

[–] [email protected] 2 points 36 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 minutes ago

I'm starting to think an article referring to LLM as AI is s red flag, while them referring to them as LLM is a green flag.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Nearly half of U.S. adults

Half of LLM users (49%)

No, about a quarter of U.S. adults believe LLMs are smarter than they are. Only about half of adults are LLM users, and only about half of those users think that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

to be fair they're American and they're LLM users, so for a selected group like that odds are they really are as stupid as LLMs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

oh my god 49% of LLM users are pathologically stupid.

and still wrong.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Still better than reddit users...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

where do you think these idiots spend their time?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

LLMs don't even think. Four year olds are more coherent. Given the state of politics, the people thinking LLMs are smarter than them are probably correct.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

literally dogs are smarter and have more reasoning ability.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Than half of LLM users? Probably

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

also that, yes.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Next you'll tell me half the population has below average intelligence.

Not really endorsing LLMs, but some people...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

pathologically stupid, and still wrong. yes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 hours ago
[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

They are. Unless you can translate what I'm saying to any language I tell you to on the fly, I'm going to assume that anyone that tells me they are smarter than LLMs are lower on the spectrum than usual. Wikipedia and a lot of libraries are also more knowledgeable than me, who knew. If am grateful for one thing, it is that I am not one of those people whose ego has to be jizzing everywhere, including their perception of things.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The statement is "smarter", not "possesses more information". None of the things you listed (LLMs, libraries, Wikipedia, etc.) have any capacity to reason.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 minutes ago* (last edited 8 minutes ago)

The only thing you've argued is that you are choosing one particular definition of smart, ignoring the one I was using, and going all Grammar Nazi into how that's the only possible definition. As I've said, if am grateful for one thing, it is that I am not one of those people whose ego ^is^ ^shallow^ ^enough^ ^to^ has ^/have^ to be jizzing everywhere, including their perception of things.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

moron opens encyclopedia "Wow, this book is smart."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 hours ago

If it's so smart, why is it just laying around on a bookshelf and not working a job to pay rent?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago

"US".... Even LLM won't vote for Trump

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

only boomers and tech-unsavy people think that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

unfortunately, no. when the concept of machine intelligence was first being explored, marvin minsky(I think)'s secretary used ELIZA, the basic fits-on-a-page. they said it was absolutely a person, that they were friends with it. he walked them through it, explained the code (which, again, fits on one page in a modern language. a couple punch cards back then, you can look at what looked at first glance like a faithful python port here). the secretary just would not believe him, INSISTED that it was a person, that it cared about them.

this was someone working around the cutting edge of the field, and being personally educated by one of those big 'great man' type scientists-and not one of the egotistical shithead ones who'd have been a garbage teacher.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

i guess the 90% marketing (re: linus torvalds) is working

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 hours ago (8 children)

If you don't have a good idea of how LLM's work, then they'll seem smart.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Until you ask them how many R's are in strawberry.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

Don’t they reflect how you talk to them? Ie: my chatgpt doesn’t have a sense of humor, isn’t sarcastic or sad. It only uses formal language and doesn’t use emojis. It just gives me ideas that I do trial and error with.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

If I think of what causes the average person to consider another to be “smart,” like quickly answering a question about almost any subject, giving lots of detail, and most importantly saying it with confidence and authority, LLMs are great at that shit!

They might be bad reasons to consider a person or thing “smart,” but I can’t say I’m surprised by the results. People can be tricked by a computer for the same reasons they can be tricked by a human.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So LLMs are confident you say. Like a very confident man. A confidence man. A conman.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

You know, that very sequence of words entered my mind while typing that comment!

load more comments
view more: next ›