this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
774 points (97.7% liked)

politics

20563 readers
3943 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Kamala Harris’ 2024 running mate, has suggested he may run for president in 2028.

Reflecting on the Democrats’ loss to Donald Trump and JD Vance, he admitted: “A large number of people did not believe we were fighting for them in the last election – and that’s the big disconnect.”

Walz said his life experience, rather than ambition, would guide his decision.

Though his VP campaign was marred by gaffes, he remains open to running if he feels prepared.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 hours ago

It's cute that they think there's gonna be another election.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 hours ago

How about someone good?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I'm feeling pretty certain the dems will run Buttigieg. Feels like they've been prepping him for a while.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 28 minutes ago

They'll run Blinken.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

I figured Newsom, Buttigieg perhaps as VP.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

Tim Walz unleashed would have won this.

He was hamstrug by Harris. He’s likely the dem’s best choice for 2028.

So of course they’ll run Newsome or Shapiro or Hillary Clinton again because they’re a bunch of idiots.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

The Democratic Party is finished, just like the GOP.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

And Harris was hamstrung by Biden.

She could have been better.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago

Or she could have not played this game, that she willfully engaged in. Harris is the epitome of a career politician that rose through the ranks by doing what the party elites wanted her to do.

Once she was announced candidate, she had all the options to go for her own platform and grow a spine, if she has one. Also that is a quality that is crucial in a president, who wants to lead the supposedly most powerful country on earth.

And this shows, what the DNC wants. They dont want a strong leader. They want a puppet they can control. This is also why they were more than happy to have Biden go for another 4 years, not despite, but because of his declining mental state making him a great puppet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

Pretty much any reasonable person unleashed by the Democratic party would have won.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (19 children)

Walz was great in 2024. He had enthusiasm and actually answered the interviewers' questions. I would have preferred the symbolic victory of a black woman president, but I like Walz better as an individual person. I think he could have won if he'd been the presidential candidate. Well, Harris won too, but I mean he could have won even with the voter suppression stealing all those democratic votes.

President Walz and Vice President Cortez is the future we need. But probably not the future we'll get.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 21 minutes ago

What exactly were his policy positions? What was important to him? Back in my day candidates spoke about those. Now he just runs with his big goofy smile and talks about being a coach.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I would have preferred the symbolic victory of a black woman.

This is why DEI is getting bitchslapped the fuck off.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

And why are planes falling out the sky after they got rid of DEI?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 minutes ago

Planes were falling out of the sky way before that. Haven't you heard of Boeing?

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Thinking there is going to be a real election in 2028 is the most optimistic thing I've heard in a while.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

There's going to be an election, or we're going to learn the meaning of "All enemies, foreign and domestic".

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›