this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
124 points (98.4% liked)

Fediverse

29362 readers
1993 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Cross-posted from "If you could improve PeerTube, what would you improve?" by @[email protected] in [email protected]


What keeps you away from PeerTube? What features does PeerTube lack? If you were the developer of PeerTube, how would you improve it?

(page 2) 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I think the only thing it needs is a mainstream instance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

What’s a mainstream instance?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

More content. We need 100% of the Creative Commons videos on YouTube to be mirrored, to start

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

We had vidcommons.org once, that hosted a lot of CC content. Unfortunately the owner couldn’t afford to keep it running.

If you now a source of CC videos, let me know.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Import/export subscriptions

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

A good app that feels native

A short video feature that let me browse like tiktok tbh. I know people think short videos are bad but blender tutorials, recipe videos, leftist information are great on tiktok because theyre forced to get straight to the point without fluff like youtube videos that purposely extend the video so you watch more ads.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I tried to sign up for an account, I was going to use it to create long form content, so I picked some tags (which definitely leave out too many broad categories to be particularly useful, and is thus incredibly limiting) that seemed somewhat related to what I wanted to do.

I then looked through the instance list based on those tags, and tried to find one that fit.. and I couldn’t, because all of them had some caveat or blurb or whatever that made me go “nope, probably not here..”

The problem is that I had to click through multiple pages to hit those caveats in the instance rules/description during the signup process, and I had to do it for every one I wanted to check out. They weren’t at all listed on the main page, and they probably should be, maybe under a popup tooltip sort of button. As it stands it was a huge waste of time, and I gave up, and lost interest in having a channel. Maybe I’ll browse it if it ever picks up, but frankly the process of signing up to be a content creator is far too onerous.

Maybe that’s a problem with the instance owners and how they have things set up, maybe with the way the whole platform works, I don’t really know. It was pretty consistent though, so I assume it’s a platform problem.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I thought about uploading videos, but I could never figure out how.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

@asudox I love the idea of peertube. I have a couple of accounts. It used to be easier to load new content by URL when it supporfted input from YouTube, but YT has gone out of their way to maintain their virtual monoply. In order for such a service to be more useful than just sharing videos with your immediate friends and family you need a way for creaters to make money, which i think is going to be easier on #NOSTR . I think a better question is how do we make nostr useful for more than just bitcoinbois.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

How does nostr make it easier to monetize video plays?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

@asudox then again having a tool that is only used for sharing videos with immediate friends and family is fine too. Not everything needs to be focused on killling off a particular non-free software for it to have value in and of it self.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I mean, if it had invidious' functionality tacked on, i might be swayed to use it. That being said, rip public invidious instances

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago
  • Featured creators on homepage (by admin)
  • opt-out federation
  • discovery algorithm that doesn't suggest 3 year old videos as "trending"
  • A mobile app that works
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I want the ability to have everything behind a login. I don't want people not signed in watching videos and wasting bandwidth.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I mean I guess this would be an OK option. Disabled by default. IMHO this is the problem with YouTube lol

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

The ability to post a video to multiple co-authors' channels.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Ads. If I could press a button and inject 30 second ads into videos that would cover the cost of the server, I'd run an instance today and start mirroring a fuckoad of content from YouTube

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›