this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
780 points (98.8% liked)

Not The Onion

12326 readers
1801 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 25 minutes ago
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (6 children)

Am..Am I agreeing with Marjorie Taylor Greene?

Is..Is Marjorie Taylor Greene making smart, intelligent, good points?

We really are in bizarro world.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 minutes ago

When Democrat politicians fuck up, other Democrats will absolutely call for, and get, resignations. Even things that boil down to consenting adults in privacy can result in resignations when it's seen to compromise a politician.

When Republicans fuck up, the party circles the wagons and goes full defensive. They will absolutely fight to resist any calls to resign, using any tactic they can think of to keep their latest pedo/pervert/con man/criminal in power. Only if the evidence is incontrovertible, and the outcry impossible to ignore, will they ever consider resignation, and as we've seen with Gaetz, that's not even necessarily the end of their career.

MTG is exactly the kind of brainlet to think that Democrats work the same way Republicans do. She thinks "Release all the Ethics reports" will make Democrats back down, or at least intimidate them. A party agreeing to release ethics reports relating to their own people is utterly unthinkable to her.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

A broken clock is still right 2 times a day.

You're giving her too much credit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 33 minutes ago

Eh she's more like a 24 hr clock. Or maybe one of those little "comic-a-day" calendars that you can out on your desk that always seem to be on the wrong day until you remember to update it...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 46 minutes ago* (last edited 46 minutes ago)

Don't worry, you agree with her words but not her intent. She doesn't actually want to do it, she just wants to use the threat of it to keep Gaetz's report secret.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 31 minutes ago (1 children)

Marjorie Taylor Greene thinks that the Democratic party is far more morally corrupt than the Republican party. So therefore she believes that this is a nuclear option she does not realize that this is what everyone literally wants, well everyone except for the people in her own party.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 24 minutes ago

MTG seems to be in the minority of elected Republican representatives in that she actually seems to believe the things she says

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 minutes ago

She's not, i don't think she wants this to happen and i think she knows that people won't agree to this kind of thing.

But what she's saying is right. The people deserve to know what our representatives are up to.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Don't worry, she's not, at least not on purpose. Even a blind pig can find an acorn once in a while.
Pretty sure she's being sarcastic.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 42 minutes ago

Blind pigs are far more capable than this creature.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

She's right and all...

But will it actually matter? The public voted for a pedo rapist felon. Surely if the triple threat is your pick for president, to be considered "incompatible" you would have had to do something truly horrific.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 minutes ago (1 children)

I'm thoroughly convinced this country would have elected Jeffery Dahmer.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 minutes ago

If he had an "R" next to his name, no doubt.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 hour ago

Ummm, Ok!!! Don't threaten me with a good time

[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Ok.

Do it.

The overwhelming problem is that the Dems tend to hold their members accountable while the republicans absolutely DGAF and happily keep literal criminals in their ranks.

She’s basically acknowledging there’s plenty of dirt, but the only offenses they’ll care about is their opponents’.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 hour ago

yes absolutely! do that!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Its actually clever. When the repubs block the release of the reports she will claim the dems balked at releasing the reports because they are the dirty ones.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago

How many of these ethics reports even really exist? Gaetz existed I thought because he was under investigation for his crimes and they said if he dropped out it would be sealed.

Do they actually have reports for everyone? If so that's great, but I can't imagine they were actually investigating every person in the same manner.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Even a broken clock is right twice a day...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder how long we'll have to wait for the second time.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 59 minutes ago

Random word generator about 15 years ago, been my handle ever since.

[–] [email protected] 124 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah, nothing wrong with that

You know what's wrong though?

Her brushing over the fact that Gaetz is a pedo rapist. You'll never hear her admit to this because the republican party never admits that they are the source of all the shit they accuse everyone of.

Fuck this waste of oxygen.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I hear this often on Democrat centric pages but I never even saw his name on conservative sites until his nomination. What is he confirmably guilty of? I'd like to know.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 minutes ago

He hasn't been found guilty of anything, yet, but that's largely (imo) because the Merrick Garland DOJ has refused to prosecute and blocked attempts to independently figure out what the hell he's doing.

I think it's highly likely he's guilty of sex trafficking minors and both the DOJ and the ethics committee know this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Those two are peas in a pod as well.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 hours ago

17 in georgia? Almost an old maid....

I kid, i kid.

So did Matt...

[–] [email protected] 71 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

"For my Republican colleagues in the House and Senate, If we are going to release ethics reports and rip apart our own that Trump has appointed, then put it ALL out there for the American people to see. Yes.. all the ethics reports and claims including the one I filed, all your sexual harassment and assault claims that were secretly settled paying off victims with tax payer money, the entire Jeffrey Epstein files, tapes, recordings, witness interviews. But not just those, there's more, Epstein wasn't/isn't the only asset. If we're going to dance, let's all dance in the sunlight. I'll make sure we do," the lawmaker said in a post on X.

Interesting, she's going the Madison Crawthorn route. Remember what happened to him? They dished up all the dirt they could find on him and hung him out to dry. This sounds noble of her, but she's using this as a threat to try to force them not to go after Gaetz, her pedophile buddy.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

She's actually threatening the Republicans explicitly, I assumed she was going with the 'both sides do it' argument.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 minutes ago

She's definitely going after the Republicans because they're the ones who have the power to force this release. The Dems have no real impact as long as the Republicans vote as a bloc, which they are likely to do. This is basically a threat to people who might step out of line that their records might be next.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 625 points 15 hours ago (9 children)
[–] [email protected] 108 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

I don't care if they are Republican or Democrat. If they are criminals, they should go to jail. Release the Epstein files and send Bill and Trump to jail.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Thats the thing I don't think they get.

"Ok, well our guy will go to jail, but so will yours!!!"

"That's fine."

"But then we BOTH lose!"

"This isn't a MAD doctrine situation. This is supposed to be more like a scorched earth situation. No corruption left behind."

And I don't think they grasp that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

It would do more to drain the swamp than anything Trump had ever imagined.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago

She is only saying it because she is positive the files will never get released.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

What they don't grasp is that we'd send our guy to jail: because they won't.

That's the difference.

When a corrupt democrat is exposed they're expelled (bye bye Cuomo)

When a corrupt republican is exposed they're re-elected.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 hours ago

Even if it’s egregiously overstated (Al Franken).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 169 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Just make them all public all the time! That'll show those fucking libs.

[–] [email protected] 97 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

As a liberal I would be so fucking owned by this

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I don't think this is as stupid as it sounds. With some exceptions Democratic voters tend to punish their representatives for corruption, but republican voters never do

[–] [email protected] 41 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

So you're saying she's betting that while republicans will have significantly more corruption, democrats will be the only ones punished because their voter base is the only one that actually cares? Honestly, you could very well be right about the result of a hypothetical universal ethic report release, though I'd be surprised if MTG was smart enough to think 2 steps ahead like that.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 hours ago

The Republicans control the process to determine who gets punished.

So MTG is taking her shot to be Joe McCarthy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 358 points 15 hours ago (43 children)

This argument reveals that she thinks both sides are playing the same game. Progressives don't support corrupt leaders. MTG does.

load more comments (43 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 12 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 207 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Deal

Edit: no takebacks

[–] [email protected] 38 points 12 hours ago

For once I agree with this ghoul.

load more comments
view more: next ›