this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
179 points (95.4% liked)

Technology

59446 readers
3684 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

The concerns are true but if people leave Twitter for Bluesky it's still an improvement because Elon uses the algorithm to boost far-right content and he has your data.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Day 2984783 of mentally substituting "enshittification" with "rot"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 8 minutes ago) (1 children)

Enshittification is specifically how something inevitably gets worse and more anti-user due to pressures from capitalism/shareholders/profit incentive.

Rot, at least in my mind, is not that specific. It could mean the codebase is not well maintained and slowly failing, as an example.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yes, that's true, but the word sounds bad so I'm using the more fun one. I suppose we could use a qualifier, like "corporate rot"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I mean, what if “we” just stop using various social media platforms all together? I remember the days when various people never really shared their opinions and beliefs about most topics to the general public. Maybe we should get back to face to face conversations about life topics.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

It's unlikely it'll go back in the bottle, and that style of social media his capable of facilitating positive social change (Arab spring as one example) that may not have been possible without it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

Agreed, I left twitter almost a year ago and haven't felt the need to sign up for any of its alternatives, federated or not. I just haven't felt like my life is missing anything by not using these platforms.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

I totally get where Cory is coming from on this. He's been around long enough to have actually seen these things happen, from a perspective that's effectively unique. I believe him when he talks about this stuff. I get his point of not putting effort into building up a platform that can hold him and his audience hostage.

but here's the good part.

People bailing on Twitter to join Bluesky is reasonably easy (there are tools available to find your friends on the new system). If it's easy to bail on Twitter to join Bluesky, it will be similarly easy to bail on Bluesky to join Mastodon, if/when that becomes necessary.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 57 minutes ago

Yes, because it's so easy to get people to switch to a different service!

I tried to get my friends to move from Facebook to Diaspora. How many of them did? ZERO. Not even the ones who like to talk about how much they hate Facebook.

Look what it took to peel off users from Twitter! The last straw had to be Elon getting a dictator elected. And even then, it's only a fraction of users.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

There's a quote from Eric S. Raymond about the issue of getting people to switch to something better (in this case the OS Plan 9) if there's already something that's fulfilling the need just enough that it becomes difficult to get anyone to move.

it looks like Plan 9 failed simply because it fell short of being a compelling enough improvement on Unix to displace its ancestor. Compared to Plan 9, Unix creaks and clanks and has obvious rust spots, but it gets the job done well enough to hold its position. There is a lesson here for ambitious system architects: the most dangerous enemy of a better solution is an existing codebase that is just good enough.

The fear now is that people will just switch to Bluesky until it becomes like Twitter, and it's not a guarantee that Mastodon will be next in line. It could be another closed service that's primed to take its place, and thus, the cycle continues.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Except it's been 2 years and most people haven't yet migrated away from Twitter to anything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

That's true from our perspective, but not from someone like Cory's.

The trap he writes about being stuck on these platforms is because he doesn't just have friends and people he follows on these platforms — he has an audience. And closing his Twitter or Facebook or whatever would mean leaving large audiences that he has built up behind.

Cory stays on those platforms as his own version of the (justifiable, but regretful) compromise he writes about companies making. Better to stay on those shitty platforms and continue to reach people than abandon both the shitty platforms and his audiences there.

That's why he doesn't want to put effort into building an audience somewhere that might force him into the same compromise again.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

It's not outside capital that leads to enshittification, it's leverage that enshittifies a service.

A VC that understands that they can force you to wreck your users' lives is always in danger of doing so. A VC who understands that doing this will make your service into an empty – and thus worthless – server is far less likely to do so (and if they do, at least your users can escape).

Incredibly clear article pointing out that no individuals will ever be able to resist enshittifaction pressures indefinitely.

The only way to prevent people with power from emiserating others is to structurally remove any benefit to doing so.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

Last 16 years of my life have taught me (though I had read that stated before, just without such experimental confirmation) that even such obvious mechanisms humans don't understand.

I mean, if you show the world as consisting of negotiating groups exchanging value in different dimensions, it's pretty clear.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

Power corrupts. No news there.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

All hail NOSTR protocol 🫡

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

No good clients.

And no clear intended usage scenario. That's also why IPFS is not very popular.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's even less cost to switch it there's nothing to switch

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's why some people just create their own instances.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

Yes, but I didn't, despite running several of my own servers it's extra time I get little return for

I don't even know what nostr relays I'm using

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It's very promising, but I find it confusing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

Yeah it’s a new frontier but it’s cool