this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
116 points (88.7% liked)

Technology

59357 readers
5571 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 27 minutes ago

Lemmy does not understand that people are leaving X cuz of Nazis, not cuz it’s a centralized corpo platform.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 39 minutes ago

If it was owned by the community that moderated it, then yes. But no it's owned by another rich asshole.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 25 minutes ago

Shame that it's another Capital-owned platform taking the spotlight. I'm not surprised unfortunately. We'll be in the same place we are now in 10 years.

I'm preaching to the choir, but mastodon is the better platform if you want more authentic community and conversation.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

I like Jason but he completely missed the boat on this one.

The active migration away from social media networks that are owned, controlled by, and distorted by the richest men and most powerful companies in the world to a decentralized platform that is not owned and controlled by billionaires is one of the more hopeful things to happen in what has largely been a bleak year for the human internet as AI slop infects everything and billionaires put their thumbs on the scale of what we see on social media.

He says this and yet jumps to Bluesky, a platform created by Jack Dorsey and now owned and managed by a crypto bro? You don't need powers of prophecy to see where Bluesky is headed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

Whether it soon becomes possible to self host an AppView, the one remaining centralized component will tell us a lot about where it's headed.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 hours ago

Honestly I don't know what's up with the mass delusion about Bluesky being oligarch-free. It's understandable that most don't know or haven't looked into it, but then some folks that should know better are displaying the same ignorance.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 hours ago

He says this and yet jumps to Bluesky, a platform created by Jack Dorsey and now owned and managed by a crypto bro?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

It’s very telling that all across lemmy this is being celebrated. Looks like most people completely missed the point.

I don’t myself like mastodon very much, but if you came to lemmy to stick it to the man it’s a bit silly to cheer on the next man, which is what bluesky is.

Twitter will remain a place for the Right and nut job grifters , probably absorb truth social and the others. bluesky will become the place for liberals and centrists who jerk each other off because they have a degree and gay friends and think they are enlightened.

Sorry , nobody asked for that rant .

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

People aren't going to be convinced of social/communism overnight.

I celebrate the move to BlueSky as positive in that they are no longer propping up an apartheid tech bro who's now running a meme branch of US Government, and also because many of them are doing the thing they were scared to do before: leave. They now know how that feels and what it will be like rebuilding friend groups and such.

It's not the anti-corpo step many are deluding themselves to believe it is, but getting out of the muck and learning how to take the step to change something are both things I see as positives that can be guided to better things in the future.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

musk could just buy it. jack already sold twitter to him, and while musk might have comprehended how shitty a deal it was (i mean he tried to back out of the contract and all); he doesn't seem like the guy who would be smart enough to avoid cost sunk fallacy and might want to buy bluesky to keep digging that hole. and jack wouldn't turn him down for a bid on bluesky for the same reason he didn't turn him down before - money. heck, if the rightwing shittards were ready to really destroy the "liberal web" they'd make sure musk could buy and convert bluesky too. nowhere for "liberals" to run after that, because they already had the option for mastodon and choose fucking bluesky like months to a flame.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

musk could just buy it. jack already sold twitter to him,

Yeah, certainly, or some other billionaire. I think it goes without saying that most of us here understand the flaws with centralized services.

I'm not saying it's the best choice ever, but I'm hopeful that the choice to leave Xitter might do positive things to people's mentality when BlueSky almost certainly repeats history. It's not likely to happen right away, as even an offer to buy would take time to approve, so for now, I'm taking it as a net positive.

The Fediverse will continue to grow and change in the meantime, and we'll all still be here to help them migrate to better things in the future.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 44 minutes ago

Yea, it would seem the embrace from those “who should maybe know better” is based on it being the appropriate compromise to make progress in this field.

BlueSky is not just another centralised platform. It’s open source (or mostly), based on an open protocol and an architecture that’s hybrid-decentralised. The “billionaire” security, AFAICT, is that we can rebuild it with our own data should it go to shit.

This thread from Andre Staltz is indicative I think: https://bsky.app/profile/staltz.com/post/3lawesmv6ik2d

He worked on scuttlebut/manyverse for a long while before moving on a year or so ago. Along with Paul Frazee, a core dev with bsky who’d previously done decentralisation, I think there’s a hunger to just make it work for people and not fail on idealistic grounds.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 44 minutes ago

we're on lemmy, yet over the past few days there has been probably 100+ posts and so many more pro-bluesky comments written. so i'd say most of us here apparently do not understand it.

the worst part about all this isn't that bluesky is getting traction, i really couldn't care less about it since i'm happy with Mastodon as it is. the worst part is that a critical mass is moving somewhere else than the fediverse which indirectly let's facebook groups maintain their dominance over the hobby space. it may sound contrived, but i firmly believe that if the fediverse gains critical mass. regardless of service. then the hobby space could actually, finally, move off that shitty platform, but for the third time, Mastodon devs didn't care to cease the moment, so it's never going to happen, and probably not even when the flagship (Mastodon) finally launches groups (which was promised a 2020 release, 4 years behind schedule and absolutely no updates, feels like vapor ware at this point and facebook will always be king because of it). but, maybe bluesky will offer a good groups feature, and then the hobby space will happily move from one dumpster fire to another, yay. i guess, the devil you know, and all that, has never been more appropriate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 34 minutes ago

musk could just buy it. jack already sold twitter to him, and while musk might have comprehended how shitty a deal it was (i mean he tried to back out of the contract and all); he doesn't seem like the guy who would be smart enough to avoid cost sunk fallacy and might want to buy bluesky to keep digging that hole. and jack wouldn't turn him down for a bid on bluesky for the same reason he didn't turn him down before - money.

That's actually not as easy with Bluesky. It's decentralized enough that buying it doesn't help control it that well. The previous owners or someone else could easily go set up another shop and compete using the same network and protocol.

Do I wish Mastodon were coming out on top? Sure. But Bluesky is still a significant improvement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Whhhhhhy?

This is the same thing. This is the exact same type of platform that will eventually go the same way. This is shooting yourself in the foot once, then aiming the shotgun at the other foot and pulling the trigger thinking that the bullet was a fluke the first time.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 56 minutes ago

Because most people switching don’t know (or care) about the fediverse and decentralization. They are regular internet users who just want to get away from the cesspool that is twitter, so they go where other people are going.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

To be fair Musk buying twitter and turning it into a Nazi propaganda site was kind of flukey.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

Bluesky just got major investment from a crypto bro...

It's not flukey...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 hour ago

Twitter was already really bad, Musk just brought back the Nazis and fired all the people that were the guardrails.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Was it though?

A billionaire buys or funds a privately owned platform and does with it as he pleases, despite the obviously humanitarian route being something different. Have we really never seen that before?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

Sure the billionaire buying stuff thing happens, but a Nazi billionaire?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

The CEO of Bluesky just posted they hit 17M users today after hitting 16M in the last 24 hours.

The juice is juicin'.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Threads, Blue Sky and Mastodon are at 292.8m mau vs Twitter’s 304m

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Sure, but what percentage of users are bots on twitter at this point?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

80%, if I'm feeling optmistic!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

We are witnessing the rise of a new platform (in terms of relevance) in real time, this will probably be one of the key points in our digital decade, and it's happening right now! Have you thought about it?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 hours ago

Anything which drives nails into the xitter coffin is a good thing as far as I'm concerned. Bluesky may not tick many people's boxes here on lemmy, but this migration shows that lots of people wanted to leave xitter but didn't see an option. Threads clearly didn't attract them, likely due to the owner. I hope it nothing else, Bluesky is a less toxic place and xitter and musk become less relevant. In the long run Bluesky may end up being another head of the hydra , but for now, it's not, and it may get people used to the idea of federation.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 hours ago

I'm really enjoying Bluesky strangely enough, not normally my thing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

the great migration to another investor-backed patiently waiting disaster. enjoy it while it's good. if only they used activitypub. Mastodon is just too confusing for the average person, it will never take off. bluesky streamlines everything into being simple and understandable to the average user. I laugh when I see people circle jerking about being better than twitter when in reality it was started by the same people and all it takes is someone with too much money and it'll be another fall-off story.

edit: I say this as someone who uses it, beats using shitter in it's festering decaying state.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

The main thing I would like to know is why so many people nowadays want a microblog platform, whether it is X or Bluesky or Mastodon, and why community-based platforms like Lemmy are getting relatively little attention in comparison.

Is it just that these people weren't seriously online before the rise of microblogs? They didn't start out with phpBB-style forums, so don't miss their existence and think that individuals having followers is the normal state of the Internet? I'm genuinely not super sure what's going on.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 hours ago

It's venture capital. Eventually it will stop being open source and will enshitify just like every other platform. So nothing is changing long term in my opinion.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

Anybody recommend a good mastodon instance?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

my personal solo instance is great but the admin is an asshole.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (3 children)

Pick any instance that suits your interests: https://joinmastodon.org/en/servers There is also this picker.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

I just moved our D&D account over there.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

is also decentralized and is federated, meaning it is moving toward a future where users “own” their audiences and can port them elsewhere (you can, and many do, argue about the details here, and about the differences between ActivityPub, which Mastodon uses, and the AT Protocol, which Bluesky uses).

Best coverage yet for that alone

load more comments
view more: next ›