this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
125 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

59010 readers
4872 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 48 points 10 months ago (2 children)

With plasma.

Saved you a click. The article is still good, though.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So, burning it?

Weren't there some plastic eating bacteria too?.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

It seems like they are still researching the actual effect but it's sounds more that it's breaking the chemical bonds apart by using electrical energy on concentrated areas of the chemical. My hypothesis is that it's like how electrolysis breaks the bonds between hydrogen and oxygen in water.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Cool! We all have plasma in our bodies so PFAS isn't a problem then.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

Not that kind of plasma.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This sounds promising. Wish we could do something about microplastics as well.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

we're going to have to filter the entire ocean to capture these shits as well as the plastic. or release shit tons of bioengineered things to eat the shit, which is another fun game of wreck-entire-ecosystems-roulette.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

On today's episode of "What Could Possibly Go Wrong?"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

“There are new ones being put on the market each year,” says Timothy Strathmann, a civil and environmental engineer at the Colorado School of Mines in Golden.

Any chance we could, you know, stop doing this immediately?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

it's like how they finally figured out who mr Swirl was...seems like plasma and pfas woulda been tested long ago but, hey, steps forward are to be rewarded.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I think the key is using argon bubbles as a method of nucleation for the PFAS as well as an efficient medium for the plasma to be carried to the chemical. I'd imagine it would function like a neon light with water and a bubbler in it.

Making something like this likely wouldn't have been high on the list of first things to try, especially when applying it to an entire world of contaminated water.