this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
788 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19047 readers
3713 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 40 minutes ago

What's his beef with The Onion? Why is he trying to run them out of business?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

He was talking about his supreme court appointees and how long they would last since it's a lifetime appointment and he put them in young. Merit and seniority never crossed his mind, only opportunistic gaming. He probably wouldn't be bragging about it if supreme court appointees were only four year appointments.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

Any limit would be an improvement, even 10 or 20 years.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 hours ago

He’s both the joke and the punchline.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 hours ago

"But you're a 78 year old person running for president"

"Let's watch me stand on stage and listen to music for 45 minutes"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

only thing hes ever said with any truth to it

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

False. One time he said the economy does better under democrats.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Long before he ran for president, presumably

[–] [email protected] 28 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Considering the previous two elections, Trump just called the majority of the country idiots.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

"I love the uneducated!" - Donald John Trump

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

But he told Putin the J stood for Joseph!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Biden wasn't that bad a choice. I would have preferred someone to the left of him, by a lot, but I can acknowledge that he's done an objectively good gob, all things considered.

That infrastructure bill is already righting the economy. I think it could go further, but these things take time. Even so, we're in a much better position today than 4 years ago. We could be better, but where we are isn't horrible for where we came from.

So yes, Biden has enacted policy competently. Overall a C+. Maybe even a B- but there are things I'm unhappy with.

Like his DoJ slow walking the Jan 6th prosecutions, and not being aggressive about them. I mean, it was an open conspiracy to overthrow the US government. That had the wife of a Supreme Court Justice involved, along with about a dozen former and current Republican lawmakers.

The sentencing hearings for all of them should have been held last year, and yet most of them haven't even been charged.

Then there are the genocides.... I can understand the ones where the US is not involved at all (beyond them being organized on Facebook, we should be doing something about that after all...) but the genocide in motion that the US is actively enabling... that shit needs to stop for Biden to get that coveted A.

Still miles better than Trump... And due to First Past the Post, that's the options we have. Come November 10th (for incumbents that win, Jan 10th for the newly elected) I'll be sending letters to my congressmen, and anyone else who's address I can find, talking about voting reform. Real voting reform, not the flawed RCV bullshit. But things like Approval and STAR.

Harris seems like the sort of person who will at least focus on the DoJ, so carrying on the Biden policies, and maybe a few tweaks of her own, she'd be in solid B- range. Maybe up to a B+ if she enacts some actual social policy. But no A until the Genocides stop, or at least is US stops enabling them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I basically agree 100% and am voting for Harris with no hesitation… however saying that the difference between a B+ and an A is a genocide or two is kind of an odd way to put it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I'm a realist.

The US has been involved in one genocide or another since its founding. We Can do better, but likely will not.

And I'm also a student of history. Almost every country on the planet has been or is currently involved in some sort of genocide or ethnic cleansing. Because humans kind of suck. We can be better, but we almost never make that choice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I’m a realist.

The US has been involved in one genocide or another since its founding. We Can do better, but likely will not.

😦

[–] [email protected] 1 points 54 minutes ago

Yup, the US was founded on high ideals and blatant hypocrisy.

We're doing better than when we started, but there's a lot of room to grow.

And I can say that is true for pretty much every country on Earth. Humanity in general can do better, but to actually put that into practice needs a highly educated population who are actively engaged with government. And to get there will require some structural changes to the government itself.

Changes like abandoning Ordinal Voting Systems in favor of Cardinal voting systems. And expanding the size of the government massively.

As much as I hate the corpo Dems, the Progressives might just be the key to moving forward. The Regressives of the Republican Party are right out, a complete step backward. And due to Plurality, those are our choices.

So yeah, we work with the system we have, until we can change it into something better.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Also the current choice is between "steady as she goes (genocide and all)" and "ramp that genocide right the fuck up, maybe do some at home again, too".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Biden and Harris have made some slight noises about being unhappy with Israel.

But they're likely waiting for after the election to make any sort of move. But I'm not hopeful that it will be a large move.

Trump would make a large move to ramp things up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Yeah I wasn’t happy about Biden, I held my nose and voted for him and was kinda shocked. I’m pissed about Palestine and suspect he’s going to be remembered as a soft hand in an era in need of major change. But the infrastructure bill is huge. Our infrastructure was in catastrophic straits and while it likely won’t be remembered for what it did, that’s a failing of humans not of the bill. The best trait vital infrastructure can have is boring, and according to the experts our infrastructure was on the verge of being downright exciting.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Harris seems like the sort of person

That quote and the fact that she isn't Biden or Trump is her 90% of her campaign as of this moment. Feel free to link me her official platform otherwise.

Thank you for your grading scale breakdown. My own scale is quite different. "No A until the genocides stop" is an interesting viewpoint.

Also, this whole post kind of came out of left field. Perhaps, you meant to reply to my other post from yesterday?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Mostly it started as a Biden was old, and was a fairly good choice to follow Trump.

So Age need not be a disqualifier on its own...

After that, I started rambling a bit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

That makes more sense. Thank you for clarifying.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Even Trump can occasionally be right!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago

A broken clock is right twice a day; however, a broken cuckoo clock is still cuckoo all times of the day.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 22 hours ago

He forgot he's not 40.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The guy is so fucking delusional it isn't funny. He was always a dumbass even back in the 80s.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I used to see him on Entertainment Tonight and think "this guy is an idiot. How is he so rich?"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

Inherited 400M invested in real estate and went bankrupt every time he really crapped out to avoid paying everyone. He still ended up worse off than an index fund until he became a reality TV star.

[–] [email protected] 143 points 1 day ago

Well shit, we knew that

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

every accusation is a confession

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every accusation is a 40-minute impromptu concert to cover a dementia-addled man's sudden confusion by what all these people are doing in his house

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Lol .... at this point they should just put him in a room full of about a hundred of his supporters and tell their leader that he is emperor of the United States. Then just feed them all AI generated CNN news broadcasts of his nation doing everything he wants. Let them all live like this until they die ..... none of them would probably notice the difference.

In the meantime, the rest of could go about our lives trying to save humanity on this planet.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 22 hours ago

I've seen this be called, "heavenbanning" — you are shadowbanned from a platform, but instead of just shouting into the void, the void caresses your ego with AI slop.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you used them as batteries, this would be the beginnings of The Matrix. I wanna be Tank so I can die off-screen between storylines.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 21 hours ago

He's not wrong.

[–] [email protected] 107 points 1 day ago (9 children)

He's talking about how long young people will last on the supreme court. Still gross, but this article is click-baity and dumb with its premise.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ok, imagine Joe Biden said it.

Imagine the histrionics.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah, it's a bad look essentially saying you should only put young justices on the SCOTUS in order to control it for longer. However, that is not a dumb thing to say. It's logical if your goal is control, which his obviously is. It's why the lifetime appointments are so bad. It encourages putting young, less qualified justices on the court instead of older, potentially more qualified ones.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›