A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
It's probably for her own "protection". People who speak up for justice under genocidal fascism are in extreme danger.
Zionists are pallet swapped Nazis.
There's actually some merit to this statement.
In the late 1940s, the philosophical arm of the Lehi terrorist organization literally plagiarized Nazi race science with Aryan scratched out and "God's chosen people" subbed in.
Nazi-level indoctrination of children into dehumanizing your enemies. Of all the countries in the world to see acting this way...
When a culture completely oppresses another people, then that culture naturally attempts to annihilate any empathy for its victims.
You can see the same pattern in how Nazis treated their victims, and how Americans treated their slaves.
Why are you linking to Times of Israel when the story is originally from Haaretz? That's sorta like choosing the NY ComPost coverage of an Intercept story..
I originally found it on Al Jazeera’s live coverage, which is difficult to link to. I only later found a second source, which I used. I never came across Haaretz’s coverage. I probably would have still chosen Times of Israel because “Israeli evil” coverage is less common from them than from Haaretz; I would imagine more Zionists read Times of Israel than Haaretz or they’d already care about Palestinian lives.
I probably would have still chosen Times of Israel because “Israeli evil” coverage is less common from them than from Haaretz; I would imagine more Zionists read Times of Israel than Haaretz or they’d already care about Palestinian lives.
So you're choosing the Netanyahu fanzine to increase the chance that Zionists don't dismiss the story out of hand?
Makes sense in general, but Zionists are not exactly known to be receptive to reason when it comes to the many atrocities of the fascist apartheid regime..
So you’re choosing the Netanyahu fanzine to increase the chance that Zionists don’t dismiss the story out of hand?
Yes. My powers are limited, so I do what little I can.
Fair. Keep on fighting the good fight ✊
The many faces of racism.
For some time now it's become logical that the way to maintain sanity among Israelis would be to maintain a comfortable fiction instead of facing reality. It follows that anyone attempting to poke holes in the fiction would be ostracised in order to maintain it. The alternative would be too painful. It would mean they have unequivocally failed to refrain from doing to others what was done unto them. Of course not everyone is in with the program so there would likely be a growing rift between those that want to keep living in the fantasy and those that don't.
I guess somewhat unsurprisingly a rift might open up between Israeli Arabs and Jews:
Israeli Arabs are much more likely than Jews to say the country’s military response has gone too far (74% vs. 4%).
Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2024/05/30/israeli-views-of-the-israel-hamas-war/
I would like to point out here that the vast majority identify as Palestinian with Israeli passport rather than „Israeli Arab“ which is another Zionist term that seeks to eradicate people’s Palestinian identity. Apart from thar I fully agree with your post.
Not that your claim was hard to believe, but because I like being well-sourced, I looked it up and you’re correct:
Most prefer to be identified as Palestinian citizens of Israel.[8][9][10] International media outlets often use the term "Arab-Israeli" or "Israeli-Arab" to distinguish Israel's Arab citizens from the Palestinian Arabs residing in the Israeli-occupied territories.[11]
Seems like international media should find a better label for them.
Seems like international media should find a better label for them.
They're doing what they're doing on purpose. They're complicit in helping to erase a national identity during a genocide.
Thanks! I should have provided the source in the first place to maintain a good discussion culture.
You know how bad it is by (aside from the incident as a whole of course) the fact that they used "do you support Palestine" as a shibboleth. They consider anything less than "Palestinians are inhuman pigs who deserve to be exterminated and have their land taken" as unacceptable, which is... disappointing but not surprising.
I wonder if this girl considers herself Palestinian. It describes her as a Bedouin, but it's really unclear to me whether Israeli Bedouins see themselves as Palestinians or not.
I think that historically, the Bedouins were a distinct cultural group from the non-Bedouin Palestinians, but it's also really complicated to get any ethnographic information for me as an American, because Israeli media and middle east scholarship has traditionally erased Palestinian identities, instead calling Palestinian Israelis "Arab Israelis". Do people like her family actually see themselves as apart from Palestinians? Or do they recognize themselves within this term, but keep their mouths shut because of how dangerous it is to say such a thing out loud? I do notice that in the article there is a screenshot from a tiktok of people celebrating her suspension, and the screenshot calls her "The Palestinian girl". Is this because she is one? Or is that just them applying it as a slur? I'm very curious.
Either way, as you say, it's wild that "Supporting Palestine" is such hostile accusation to be levied at her. It's just crazy. I feel so terrible for her, and also angry at what Israel has become. I think it's always been bad, but naked hostility and racism is so, so, SO much worse in this generation than it was even 30 years ago.
Historically, bedouin have been seen as a distinct ethnic/cultural group, separate from the surrounding ones. Basically, they're similar to the Roma of Europe and my understanding is that they're treated and viewed by local communities very similarly as to what the Roma go/have gone through.
They asked: “do you support Hamas?”
“They asked me if I supported Palestine, and I said no and that I only support the small children in Gaza returning to their homes.”
????
They should make every child in that school recite the first 14 fucking pages of dead baby names in the recent death report. Every single name and hell at this point show them the fucking pictures. Overhead image of each one in front of the class until their all puking in the courtyard.
They're taking boat tours to watch Gaza get bombed. The video I saw showed a toddler boy expressing joy over the destruction.
That’s cause it’s just buildings and rubble. They need to see smashed faces, crushed bodies, dismembered heads and body parts. Full on Texas chainsaw massacre in real life right in front of them. Not just buildings and non descript places.
Sure. And Israel will never allow this.
Jesus Christ.
Was a Palestinian and Israeli ministers endorse spitting on Christians.
From what I have read, Muslims, Christians, Jews coexisted peacefully, regularly doing business and relaxing together, when it was just Palestine, before Israel existed.
Jesus Christ was a Jew
Only brainwashed Germans and Israelis think these to be mutually exclusive.
Given that the Palestinians are the direct ancestors of the people of Moses upon whom be peace, the israeli state has been the worst enemy to the people of Moses since the Pharaoh.