Bookmeat

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

This says more about the attendees than the talks.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

It wasn't the developers that were at fault.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

Lost me at .NET. Hard pass.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago

If it's not clear yet, the USA's government claims they're trying to restrain Israel's genocide and continue to take steps and tip toe to peace, but in the back rooms they enable and encourage the whole of the enterprise.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

Good headline 😀

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Science?? Have you seen the abortion debate? There are vegetables classified as fruit and other horrors on the law books. Science got nothing to do with it.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not a lawyer yet still giving legal advice.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The city or county will probably have a thing called a website where you can read about all of those things for each candidate.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hmmm, I wonder if they'll just stop once they take Ukraine. Surely, they'll just mothball all of that gear they've spent the last two years ramping production up for.

[–] [email protected] 102 points 5 days ago

No. Crimea is Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago

You're exactly correct. The law as it stands is irrelevant to what these analysts think. I'm not saying Trump can call every shot, but it doesn't really get any easier to change or skirt laws he dislikes. Anyone who leans on the "but the law says..." argument is praying.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 6 days ago (2 children)

All these analysts trying to figure out how this tyrant who will be in control of all the Federal government can't do this or that because a piece of paper says so. SMH.

16
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I currently have a storage server with the following config.

Multiple raid6 volumes (mdadm) -> aggregated into a lvm volume group -> lvm volumes -> encrypted with luks1 -> (no partitioning) xfs file systems mounted and used by the os

I have the following criteria: I want to keep software raid (mdadm) with multiple raid sets, xfs, and lvm. I don't mind using 2fa, but I don't want to just store my secret keys on a dongle attached to my PC because that seems to defeat the point of encryption at rest.

My questions:

  1. Is there a better way to encrypt my data at rest?

  2. Is there a better layer at which to apply the encryption?

I'm mostly unhappy with luks1 over a whole lvm volume and looking for alternatives.

--

Thank you everyone for these great responses! I'll be looking into these ideas :)

view more: next ›