this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
383 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3659 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The video was seen millions of times across social media but some viewers were suspicious: It featured a young Black woman who claimed Vice President Kamala Harris left her paralyzed in a hit-and-run accident in San Francisco 13 years ago.

In an emotional retelling from a wheelchair, the alleged victim said she “cannot remain silent anymore” and lamented that her childhood had “ended too soon.”

Immediately after the video was posted on Sept. 2, social media users pointed out reasons to be wary. The purported news channel it came from, San Francisco’s KBSF-TV, didn’t exist. A website for the channel set up just a week earlier contained plagiarized articles from real news outlets. The woman’s X-ray images shown in the video were taken from online medical journals. And the video and the text story on the website spelled the alleged victim’s name differently.

The caution was warranted, according to a new Microsoft threat intelligence report, which confirms the fabricated tale was disinformation from a Russia-linked troll farm.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 month ago

If Russia really doesn't want Harris to be president, I take that as an endorsement. They must think she's going to do some good.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Harris is going to back Ukraine while Trump will serve it up on a platter. That's why.

It [Microsoft report] also explains how Russian intelligence actors are collaborating with pro-Russian cyber “hacktivists” to boost allegedly hacked-and-leaked materials, a strategy the company notes could be weaponized to undermine U.S. confidence in November’s election outcome.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's one reason why. There are many reasons.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Also Trump wants to pull out of NATO.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can we block Russia from the internet until after the election?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Problem is they also payed a shit ton of right wing YouTubers and Podcasters to repeat their lies. Those will continue to broadcast their shit.

Edit: I just remembered how much friendlier the internet was on every single occasion when the Russians have been singled out. So I’d say: Do it.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There isn't enough long-range armament hitting ground in Russia if they still have time, resources, and will for disinformation campaigns.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

The eastern parts of Russia are at war with Ukraine.

The western parts of Russia are at war with the US.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

Putin you little scamp. One day you support her the next your trying to help Trump.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

Of course Putin wants his best asset back into the White House. One can safely assume that copies of all the "Top Secret" papers im mar-a-lago have found their ways to Moscow long ago. And Trump will serve Ukraine on a silver platter to his Russian handler. With a smile.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's been an issue for every election since 2016.

Still great to have some concrete proof but I doubt this is going to matter for the people who need to hear it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Probably since 1952.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

And here republicans are gaslighting people by saying that BuT PuTiN HaS EndORsED kAMaLAaAaa!!!!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not just a russia troll farm but even republican tv commentators and elected officials are spreading outright blatant lies. Not to mention all the "influencers" who are paid by russia to spread lies.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Not to mention all the "influencers" who are paid by russia to spread lies.

For those unaware:

"The Department of Justice also indicted two employees of RT, a Russian state broadcaster, saying that they funneled $10 million to a U.S. media company that hired prominent right-wing influencers here in the U.S."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

"B-but Putin publicly endorsed Harris! So these reports must be lies, because he clearly hates Trump and wants him to lose!" -Clueless MAGA cult members everywhere

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

They did the same stunt with Durov before he gave up his VK and they promptly forgot about it after he caved in. He allegedly hit a cop, and for americans who want to vote blue, they adjusted it so Kamala allegedly hit a black girl. So convinient.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Now that everyone knows these exist they have to do a couple obvious fakes to draw away attention away from the insidious ones.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

And half you borscht babies cant see it

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago

Associated Press - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Associated Press:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://apnews.com/article/russia-disinformation-foreign-influence-election-microsoft-7f802f9f4a0efe206fdaad29516b1f7f
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support