this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
384 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19136 readers
4747 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I have not heard such a thing from left leaning folks, but I'd quickly shut them down if they were suggesting pity for these people.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 121 points 1 month ago (5 children)

"These voters don’t support Trump because they labor under some illusion that he’s going to rescue their communities — not anymore," Bai wrote. "They support him because he’s willing to blow up the country if it means teaching insufferable intellectuals a lesson."

This here is the real motivation of MAGAs. Half the country wants this.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sucks that part of Germany is falling asleep again.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

From what I see, so far it's more a case of the bad third waking up again. What happens next remains to be seen.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not half, a third. Another third wants to stop it, and the other third can't tell the difference.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Ah, the centrists. Because not picking a side can never be wrong, right.

...right?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago

100%. They don't care what the actual facts are. They just want to feel right and if the world burns to do that, so be it.

When you get down to it, it is a lack of emotional intelligence coupled with a lack of education which are likely factors in the development of the whole movement. It made them very ready to accept propaganda, as well.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Less than half, the 2020 election put them at about 22% (74,223,975/331,449,281).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It sounds like something I've heard before...

Target

Cambodia's previous military and political leadership, middle-class professionals, businesspeople, intellectuals, ethnic and religious minorities

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian_genocide

[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is something that needs to be said about all Republicans. Their party's been indulging in fascist politics since Goldwater ran on opposing the civil rights act six decades ago, but we keep pretending there are decent people with the intellectual capacity to serve in office who identify as Republicans anyway for some reason. The uncomfortable but simple fact is that there are only idiot Republicans who don't realize their party's continued existence is a threat to the country and evil Republicans who do, and neither should be in any kind of government office ever.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Y’all fought and killed a bunch of each other but, after defeating them, both sides just returned to the dinner table like things were normal again… Despite one of them having tried and failed to destroy it all.

How were they not just deplatformed entirely? Money, I guess?

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Their last chance was 2020. I could theoretically understand their vote in 2016. If you still support Trump it's because you agree with what he stands for, and are therefore a trash human being. It's not because "the Democrats aren't good either", it's because you're an authoritarian boot licker. End of story.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Yup. I can imagine a lot of uninformed voters supporting Trump back then simply because he had an R next to his name. He certainly can’t count on that this time.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Been ignorant... all the way back to the Tea Party and Birther nonsense.

"Aigh aint seen no 'birth certif-ee-cate!"

"It's online, have you looked for it?"

"Well, no."

"WTF do you expect? Obama going door to door? 'Hey! Y'all see my birth certificate? Here you go!'"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I'm sorry but you clearly don't remember this at all. They are idiots, but when the birth certificate was presented people didn't say they hadn't seen it, but bought into the conspiracy theory that it was faked.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The teabaggers were just more of the same people from the hatriot radio and black helicopter stuff from the 90s when they were selling each other tapes on Waco and the like, all pissed off about Ruby Ridge and stocking up on MREs and guns and ammo.

And that crap was just a rehash of the Birchers. And I'm sure the Birchers had their crazy unhinged precursors, too...the crazy unhinged bullshit on the xtianist nationalist fringe has been around for a long, long time.

I used to point and laugh at the dumbphucks that talk about how "your SSN is the number of the beast, don't use it for anything but the few cases the law requires it, yadda yadda" and now these very same assholes have a real chance of getting a dickhead like donnie with Project 2025 at the ready to enact a lot of their crazy, crazy agendas to inflict on the rest of us.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

For that first one: I knew who these people were back in elementary school. They are the ones that crossed their arms and defiantly said things like, "What do we need to even learn all this stuff for? it don't mean nuthin! Just a bunch of book-larnin! We won't need this in the real world!". And then went right on to either doing the bare minimum until they graduated, if they even did that.

And now this sort are still Karens. And now "doing their own research".

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have no pity for them anymore.

The first time they voted for trump, it was a stupid mistake and we all suffered for it.

The second time, not a stupid mistake, just stupid people.

Voting for him a third time? Now you’re just being evil. Fuck you.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Oh hell, a whole lot of them knew back when they voted for him in 2016. In fact, he had the full-throated support of Nazis like Richard Spencer.

If people pretended not to know who donnie was back then, I think there is a good chance they were lying then and now, or very very stupid.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This has been obvious, and written about, for years:

The Atlantic, 2018:

The Cruelty Is The Point

archive link to avoid paywall

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

I have friends who's loved ones are in the GOP death cult, they ask "what's the point of all this immigrant and abortion stuff, they used to not care about this at all"

I simply reply: "The cruelty is the point. DJT isn't promising to fix anything really, he's promising to hurt the right people."

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

That voter that said donnie is not hurting the people he's supposed to be hurting is a moment of one of them saying the very true part out loud.

That's exactly what they are about, and no one can tell me that there is not a huge contingent of them voting for this very reason and no other. They don't GAF about "babies", for instance, it's about making sure loose women aren't "getting away" with something. They don't GAF about "the" bible; they just don't like gay people. And on and on. None of this stuff will make their lives better in any meaningful way, but they want to see others suffer.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There are plenty of Tone Police (TM) and Enlightened Centrists (TM) that will rush in to tell everyone that it's about people that have economic anxiety and Hillary shouldn't have called a percentage of them deplorable and it wasn't AXECHUALLY an insurrection (nope, it was terrorism) and and and...

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Right? Why should we as a nation, show pity to traitors and saboteurs?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I can’t fathom anything other than straight-up rage towards them. I don’t understand how the needle’s way over there near “pity”!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I view MAGA/Republicans like Ace Rothstein views Don Ward in Casino when the lottery machines were rigged to hit jackpots, which is effectively: you’re either too dumb to see what’s happening or you’re in on it, either way you’re out!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

This is what I’ve been saying all long about these things. They don’t deserve to be protected from the backlash they so deserve.

I will always remember the folks around me that voted red in 2016, 2020 and 2024. Willful enablers of an asswhipe tyrant.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

I support the abolition of the Republican party as a whole

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

The best description I have heard is that the support of Trump over any fact or reason is because it is kayfabe. They choose to live in a fantasy because it's more appealing than the reality.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Why are they reporting on other reporting? Seems like a strange thing to do. Maybe it's a slow day in the news cycle today.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

It's an opinion piece in response to an opinion piece. No reporting found.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago

Raw Story - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Raw Story:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.rawstory.com/trump-maga-voters/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support