this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
605 points (97.9% liked)

World News

38970 readers
2419 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Labour MPs have begun quitting X in alarm over the platform, with one saying Elon Musk had turned it into “a megaphone for foreign adversaries and far-right fringe groups”.

Over the weekend, newly elected MPs took to WhatsApp groups to raise growing concerns about the role X played in the spread of misinformation amid the far-right-led riots in parts of England and Northern Ireland.

Two Labour MPs are known to have told colleagues they were leaving the platform. One of them, Noah Law, has disabled his account. Other MPs who still use X have begun examining alternatives, including Threads, which is owned by Facebook’s parent company, Meta, and the open-source platform Bluesky.

In an article for the Guardian on Monday, a former Twitter executive, Bruce Daisley, said Musk should face personal sanctions and even an arrest warrant if he continues to stir up public disorder online.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 121 points 2 months ago (2 children)

No shit. The amount of far-right propaganda, hate and disinformation it's pushing is so much that it's pretty much over the line as an extremist site now, and I expect it to start getting flagged as that with a lot more organisations.

Musk wants to set the world on fire and X is his box of matches.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (3 children)

How powerful a tool X is depends on how much legitimacy it can gain. If politicians are leaving the platform it can't be long before advertisers also leave. I'm old enough to remember Myspace. Even Facebook is a bit pacé nowadays.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago
  • passé

Or is that a language I don't know?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Advertisers have been leaving since Musk bought it. He might have wooed some back but not on the same terms as before.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Thank you for your service, Twitterenoclast 🫡

[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Of course, none of them are going to the fediverse, because social media that’s not owned by a corporate entity and ready for algorithmic enshittification is not a thing for normal people.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Tbf - once the fediverse gets big enough it's kind of open season for misinformation spreading groups. They can just join another server once the one they used got blocked. Worst case they get onto a server that actually gets used by normal people and produce a lot of casualties by getting the server defederated.

I think it's a nice concept but for this type of misinformation it's really not the best thing...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It really depends how well maintained the instances are. This extra work may come at a cost. Which may exclude some of the opportunists.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

If by "well maintained" you mean keeping a whitelist of instances, then yeah. But I doubt anyone is doing that because it's actually counterproductive to the concept of fediverse. By keeping a whitelist you are creating an in group and an out group and instances can live or die based on that grouping.

As for why you'd need a whitelist, you can't defend against a malicious attack if they keep spinning up new instances with bots designed to spread misinformation. The moment you ban once instance another one gets spun up. The only solution is a whitelist so all new instances are automatically blocked. Of course that works if all "normal" instances also have proper registration policies and can't become attack vectors.

If the fediverse becomes wildly popular defending the instance can become a full-time job as the open nature gives more attack vectors. Also most instances are ran by volunteers so it's probably not going to be a good time for anyone.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've been saying this for a year now but no one cares to listen.

Federating with all instances by default only works if admins and mods of all instances are acting in good faith. Sooner or later that won't be the case.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Do you think systems like fediseer would help with that? As I understand it's a voucher based reputation system.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

I really wish Bluesky could federate with other Mastodon servers.

Also, fuck Threads.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No offense but you guys are on almost no-one's radar. I only found out about the fediverse by googling reddit alternatives last year, and I WORK in IT.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Working in IT doesn't mean you know everything about what's on the internet.

(Source: I also work in IT. A toddler with a tablet knows more about a lot of things online than I do)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I could imagine Labour HQ running their own Lemmy server for their MPs and staff.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Would be interesting, but Lemmy and Mastodon would both need some work to tick some security and compliance checkboxes.

On the plus side, we could get proper 2FA support (i.e. Yubikeys or TOTP tokens) as a result. I'd love to get some more use out of that old yubikey.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Don't the french and german people use it? I swear I saw that post somewhere.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Took 'em long enough. Everybody should've ditched Twitter like a year ago.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Stopped using it the moment it became "X". Realized a few weeks ago that I still had an account and that I hadn't missed it once. Deleted the account and now happily live in a Twitter free bubble.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

That place was toxic before musk got a hold of it. I can't imagine how bad it is now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Whenever I reminisce about Twitter I gotta remind myself that I'm probably gonna run into 90% of what's going on there on IG anyway, two thirds of my explore page is just screenshots of tweets lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I ditched it entirely the day they admitted that killing third party apps was a feature not a bug.

I used Tweetbot for ten years, so the idea of having to raw dog a fascist’s plaything didn’t appeal to me.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

I wish own/governments/journalists started running their own mastodon instances.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago

For authentication more than anything else.

If I see [email protected] I'd know it was him. I see therealkierstarmer on twitter and it could be any joker with $8 to spare.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

On the contrary they are starting to use Twitter to declare war and post about resigning as presidential candidate.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Who declared war via a social media platform? That sounds like horrible military strategy

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Then make a package where it's easy for them to roll out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If a couple of furries can figure it out, I'm pretty sure a major Western government can do the same.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But that's not where the average voter is. It's not really where any of their constituents are.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Build it and they will come. The media will follow for the story and people will hear the message. Maybe.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

As should everyone. At a certain point you're sticking around a place that literally promotes racism and hatred and pedophilia and actual nazis well it says things about you. And I've heard the arguments before about how convenient Twitter still is, about how it was just easier. I've heard those kind of arguments about hanging out with Nazis before. Came from Germans who pretended like they weren't Nazis.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago (2 children)

the news SHOULD be everyone is quitting twitter, and get rid of the scare quotes around hate and disinformation

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

Most public facing organsations quit it when they started requiring an account to be logged in to see tweets.

What's the use of it as an official announcement platform if only logged in twitter users can see it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Meanwhile, Trump is going to DeSantis himself on Twitter tonight with an "uncensored" live conversation with Musk.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

Oh my god, he DeSantised all over himself! That's fucking disgusting. I haven't DeSantised myself since the fourth grade. I mean, sure, I've Gulianied myself, but who hasn't eaten too much Taco Bell and then Gulianied themselves on a regrettably hot day?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Oh boy, all them Jan 6 tweets right up there, it's a great reminder!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Should never have started with Twitter. Not everything has to be on social media

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

LOL. Sure, not everything, but politicians do if they want to win elections.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Are you sure? I can only think of Donald Trump as an example, and even then I think he's garnered more ridicule than support for it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Obama famously used twitter in his first election campaign to create effect. In the brief moment when I had an account, he was my only follower

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Yet they've been there for the last year and not noticed this, anyone with sense quit as soon he became owner.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That government agencies are staying with them just makes them seem like jackasses that just care about the views by any means necessary. Anne Frank would be a nobody today, nothing but a banned account in today's social networks, a lot of the intentional disinformation, narrative shaping, and hidden incontestable moderation these social networks are getting away that can completely lock away your work from any access except their own should be prosecutable and have legal recourse.

load more comments
view more: next ›