this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
428 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

58122 readers
3888 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 118 points 1 month ago (5 children)

The "platform economy" is just another term for digital landlords.

Fuck 'em.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Techno feudalism is the term, look it up

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Oh I know, I just thought using landlords would be a more concise term since most people don't know the term techno-feudalism as widely.

I'll definitely try to incorporate it in my writing more though, it's a term that I think should be known much more widely.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

lol, the irony is patreon is also a platform. Its platforms all the way down. They take 12%. If Apple wanted to be the good guy, they’d take 30% of patreon’s 12%.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Middle man skimming off the top.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure they are the top man

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The fee will only apply to memberships purchased on Patreon’s iOS app starting November 4th, 2024.

Good, I hope they shed light on Apple's shitfuckery.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yeah, I actually think this policy is 100% correct and, if more services did this instead of eating the costs, we could have a real discussion about the harm caused by arbitrary fees.

It will likely result in Apple seeking a special deal with Patreon to avoid this mess though. It's really not a good look for Apple especially as they cater themselves to the creatives market.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

they cater themselves to the creatives market

LOL only in advertising.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

Being as this is very similar to the apple epic legal fight that epic lost earlier this year, I doubt apple will make a deal. My understanding is that patreon can cave, choose to pay 27% commission, or make their own store.

Though skimming the news around epic's attempts to make a store, you "can" make a store in compliance with EU and UK laws, but apple made it kinda impossible to actually do and epic is fighting it in court again?

So patreon seems to have read the lay of things and said I guess we just have to make the best of a shitty situation and communicate everything to try to limit the pain.

It's almost like apple feels like they have the power to do whatever they want because they've created a market where they don't have competition...

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Until recently, apps were not even allowed to charge less outside their apps than on the app store or to link to outside stores.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We should thank the European Union for that.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Merci, union européenne

Hey, let's do it in all official languages of the EU. So far we've had English and French.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The EU (where I live) is a bureaucracy nightmare sometimes, and is often far too removed from citizens. It has a gazillion problems, but as far as data protections and customer rights it does some things half right.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I live in the EU and I'm happy we have it, because otherwise we wouldn't have many consumer protection laws (either because my government is stupid or because we wouldn't have enough leverage as a single country).

Many things we now take for granted are only possible thanks to the EU, like the 2-years warranty on electronic/household products.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

They were allowed to charge less, just not mention or link to it in any way. Proton has been doing it for a while that the Apple in-app purchases are roughly 30% higher.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Yeah this is well overdue

[–] [email protected] 86 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is a given for many kinds of services. Always purchase subscriptions on another device or direct through their website - never use your Apple devices' app store.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm just worried for the content creators on patreon. Their choices are a significant reduction in income, jacking up prices and pricing out some of their patrons (thus reducing their income), or if patreon pulls from apple there's a significant reduction in visibility and additional hurdles (thus reducing income).

So it seems that no matter the outcome, creators suffer the consequences of the Apple tax.

Fuck apple. Rotten to the core. Class action lawsuit in the very least.

Vote. We need House, Senate, and President to not be corporate fascists so that we can impeach at least 2 or 3 supreme court judges, replace them with rational human beings, reverse the overturning of Chevron Deference, and then let a stronger FTC gut these fucking companies.

Self dealing, competition buying, corporate fascists. The lot of them.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What we can work on is awareness. If iOS users are aware, they can choose to simply go to the website directly and make the purchase, instead of using the app. They can still use the app for consumption.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Yep, that's what everyone I know with Apple devices have always done. I used to have a Nexus 7 (rip) and an iPhone, and the prices on the App store were always higher than the prices on Android Market (rip).

I'm wondering why it's being pointed out now by everyone, but I'm not gonna complain if it leads to some sort of price parity regulation across platforms.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Fuck apple. Rotten to the core. Class action lawsuit in the very least.

We're well past class action territory. They've already been required to allow third-party app stores by the EU. They're simply not complying and no one is doing shit about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Someone's looking to get in on some anti-trust action.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I thought Apple's app store practices were found to be legal in the Epic Games trial? (unlike Google's)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which is kinda ridiculous since Apple's practices are what Google does but worse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

To paraphrase an analysis that I read awhile ago, Apple’s practices were found to be legal because Apple applied the rules unilaterally whereas Google would make backroom deals to alter the rules on an app-by-app basis.

Please take this with a grain of salt because 1) IANAL and 2) it is the middle of a workday break and I didn’t take the time to search for a source, just basing this off of memory.

If you want I can research this after work to provide sources and update my comment.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I'm okay with paying 30% where the return on investment is worth it. Both the Appstore and Google Play do literally nothing for you, except distribution, and payment processing. These really don't deserve to take such a big cut, and I don't really want to hear any more excuses in their favor

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago (18 children)

Both the Appstore and Google Play do literally nothing for you, except distribution.

I mean distribution is not "nothing". They have to maintain the app store, and process payments, and filter (most) malicious software.

It's just not worth anywhere near 30%, not to mention the flurry of ads all over the place.

At least with Android it's completely possible to have a third-party app or app store and charge using their own payment processes without ever touching the Google Play store.

Apple is a whole other level of control and anti-competitiveness, and they've been profiting off of it for decades with no intervention in sight.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

It also is likely costs that are having to be done anyway because of web based sales or other distribution channels. So it’s even worse that Apple and Google act like they’re providing so much when they’re literally just preventing businesses from using their existing infrastructure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Dunno about Apple but Google does a very bad job of monitoring the Play Store. Outright malicious apps are one thing and deceiving apps are other. Latter is a very big problem. Low quality apps minced with in app purchases/subscriptions that are carbon copies of each other.

Google arguably does a worse job of curating the Play Store (sponsored results) and has a non existent support.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

This is not about the App Store service's quality, this is about option. They could charge 50% for all I care, if we had the option to buy iOS apps from another store other than Apple's.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago

i'm so glad i'm on android

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

This couldn’t have come at a worse time, given their DOJ suit.

load more comments
view more: next ›