this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
652 points (97.8% liked)

News

23266 readers
2948 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 133 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (3 children)

JD-Wan has taught you well.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 91 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I feel dirty saying good things about Sarah Palin, but she was brought on to fire up the base and did just that. Vance has managed to alienate the base. I don’t think the incels even like him at this point.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 months ago

Yeah people forget how long people looked favorably at Palin. The response to Vance meanwhile was an immediate and visceral "no thank you"

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

Of course the incels don't like him. He argues that childless people should pay higher taxes. How did anyone think that would go over with the "never even had sex" constituency?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think the incel crowd generally want to strip women of their rights because they see women's liberty as a main reason they can't get laid.

So, I'd imagine the childless cat women thing could hit with them because they'd be like "yeah, women should stop being so up-tight and have my babies!"

Or something like that.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

yeah, single women with no kids are childless cat ladies, but single men with no kids are just victims of the uncompromising selfishness of childless cat ladies. sounds about right.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 70 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He can see useless postmenopausal women from his house.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

Brilliant response!

[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"I can see Russia from my couch!" - JD Vance

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Jr. was high AF when he talked dad into this shlub.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I’m sure Peter Thiel had some input, too.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

or just high as fuck. cocaine is a hell of a drug

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Sarah Palin was like a dog that peed on themselves because they're an idiot. Vance is like a dog that bites their owner because they're an idiot. Sure, Palin was dumb, but Vance is a real threat to all Americans.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don't tell Kristi Noem. I bet she still keeps her favorite gravel pit in great condition, just in case.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Palin was a joke because John McCain was at the top of the ticket.

If it was she was second to Trump and being groomed by the Heritage Foundation and their Project 2025, she would be scary too.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago (7 children)

But since then, he has faced a rash of bad headlines about his past comments calling Harris a "childless cat lady," his past support for a national abortion ban and even a baseless internet rumor about having sex with a couch.

It may be baseless, but it's quite plausible because he is just so...uh...the way he is. Trump, Vance, and RFK are all kinda weird. Hugging and kissing the flag, playing with dead things, etc etc.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Baseless? I thought "people are saying" was an acceptable level of fact checking. Donald certainly agrees with me.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

I think it has to be "all the best people".

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Palin was a joke. Vance is, frankly, scary.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

Moreso if you are a couch.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Palin was at-least somewhat entertaining in her madness.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

She also came across as ditzy, not creepily malicious.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

Vance 100% knows what he’s doing. He accepted that he had to sell his soul to become a successful politician.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Considering that Vance's biggest accomplishment so far is writing a best-selling book, in which he cosplays as a poor person while trashing rural Americans, this about checks out.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

Do you think he wrote that book though?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Palin alienated anyone vaguely in the middle, but on the other hand she had at least some particular support that she brought distinct from McCain (basically Tea Party folks that were not particularly excited by establishment republican nor McCain).

Vance doesn't have any particular support, he only gets indirect support for people who are "republican no matter what" or "MAGA all the way", but those people were already covered by Trump. Even in his own state his margin of victory was much slimmer than the other republicans that swept Ohio in 2022, and Ohio's not even a state considered to be a risk to Trump's campaign.

He was just a tremendously bad choice with no strategic benefit. The VP pick should somehow provide some coverage for demographics not hit by the presidential candidate, and Trump instead went with someone with very limited popularity that is a strict subset of people already supporting Trump.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

After seeing what the cultists were going to do to Pence, and that Trump was going to allow it, no one else was interested in being his VP. The only option was a bootlicker.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (9 children)

And there's not going to be any porn parody about couchfucker

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Have you tried JD Revanced? It’s much better than the original.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wait did we just find an exception to rule 34? I never thought I'd see the day...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You damn well know someone out there has drawn Vance absolutely raw dogging a leather couch and there's nothing you can do about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (3 children)

He's so spineless it's baffling that they thought this would be a good choice?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Trump thought that he'd appeal to hillbillies and poor Midwesterners. Clearly he didn't read Hilbilly Elegy beyond the title.

If he did, he would have learned that, much like Clarence Thomas with black people, Vance paints all poor people in Ohio and Kentucky as lazy welfare recipients who should just pull themselves up by their bootstraps* and work harder 🙄

*which was originally an expression for doing something literally impossible, as pulling on your own bootstraps would make you fall down.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

More unpopular or less popular?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think there's a fun bit of linguistics there. If you say more unpopular it implies that both are unpopular and one is even more so. If you say less popular, it implies that they are both popular, but one is to a lesser degree.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This type of deep, academic discussion is why I joined Lemmy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

His greatest accomplishment.

It was not an easy feat, but he prevailed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

So you're saying he's less non-unpopular

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Tech Oligarchs Test Tube Hillbilly

Common guys! It's funny!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

fyi it's "come on", but that's a common mistake.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

I mean, yeah, I would be fine with leaving Palin alone in a room with my furniture.

load more comments
view more: next ›