this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
53 points (94.9% liked)

News

23305 readers
3527 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Bypass paywall: https://archive.ph/Kz2Sp

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago (3 children)

They are considering sending a 737 max

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

It will certainly descend fast enough to get them home for dinner

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

With a set of parachutes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Holy shit. I got banned from reddit for saying the Boeing starliner astronauts should fear for their lives cuz Boeing. It was a joke, did not want it to become true! Hopefully they come home safe!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

It was a joke, did not want it to become true!

Reddit is, in fact, a joke.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Wow that's actually crazy that they banned you for that lmao they couldn't make it any more obvious they got bought off by private companies, yikes. I'm glad Lemmy isn't prone to that, inherently by design.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

A total ban like mine?

I got banned for going to sniffies and bringing people from there to r/Seattlegay, which I started during the pandemic.

They banned me site wise on all my accounts and all my devices.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They banned me site wise for saying that riot police should quit their jobs following RvW. But all the right wing trolls spewing vitriol were perfectly acceptable.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I made a bunch of comments critical of the site and then banned myself (deleted account) before they could ban me. "You can't fire me, I quit!"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

I basically did the same. Got banned for a week for calling trump a shitbag, then circumvented the ban with a new account and called the mods shitbags for it and got permabanned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Why is NASA, a publicly funded science organization, fixing the mistakes of a for profit corporation?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Because for goddamn reason we socialize the losses and privatize the profits

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Those reasons being monopolies and greed and corruption and capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because it'll look bad for NASA if people are stranded in the ISS (plus, I assume they have to foot the bill for any resulting extra resupply missions).

Also, if I'm not mistaken, NASA authorised the launch, while knowing the craft was faulty and leaking and the company malignantly incompetent, so it's partly their fault, too, or at least they were necessary accomplices.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

They gave Boeing the contract despite their obvious lack of experience in the area. There should be a forensic accounting, including any decision maker's finances, about this whole deal

The US Federal Government would be best served by ARMIES of independent accountants doing audits of all its business, and issuing CRIMINAL CHARGES for all fraud, graft, and corruption, wherever it's found.

Make it scary to give favors for bribes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

"lack of experience in the area..."

Boeing dwarfs SpaceX in experience building spacecraft.

Mercury and Gemini spacecraft were both built by the McDonnell Corp. That company merged with the Douglas Aircraft company (which built the 3rd stage of the Saturn V rocket) becoming McDonnell Douglas in 1967, which merged into Boeing in 1997. Boeing itself co-manufactured the space shuttle orbiters with Rockwell.

On paper and judging from experience and history, if you were going to pick a single company to build a spacecraft, it would be them. Not some brand new company run by a space-obsessed software engineer.

Clearly Boeing has huge cultural issues and has for a while.

Just saying if you wanted to go off experience alone, they're the best there is.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

A company doesn't have experience. people have experience.
I can't imagine that the current Boeing would have kept the spaceflight experts on staff while not being used, so I don't imagine that they had any expertis when they began the project.

Likewise neither did NASA, because neoliberal policy had gutted them for much the same reasons, and is why they are pursuing the commercial space program.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Read the article.

Boeing might opt to cancel Starliner and leave NASA with just a single provider of crew transportation. That would be painful for both NASA and Boeing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

It seems to me like we should be at the point where there should just always be a backup plan so the people taking the real risks don't have to sit around waiting for 8+ weeks as some people try to do best by them while others just try to cover their assess and pretend everything is ok because they are fucked if things aren't ok and might be inclined to risk lives in the hopes they get the good outcome.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When it had issues immediately post-launch, there were a LOT of Boeing-defenders: “oh no, keeping it there is a precaution, there’s nothing seriously wrong with it. They’re definitely not stuck on the station…”

Yeah. When this fucking death trap was launched WHILE HAVING ISSUES, I knew it wasn’t going to be a quick round trip. Frankly, I’d be amazed if those astronauts up there would be willing to take the return trip on it. NASA has a poor track record in that regard.

I absolutely love spaceflight and whole heartedly support programs. But Boeing needs to not be making spacecraft that humans fly on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Lmao.

I'm sorry to laugh, but it's just the absurdity of it all.

The downward spiral of Boeing is insane.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I got hired 2 days before all this shit! Had a pretty alright gig as a regional analyst before accepting. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

At this point I'm expecting the big Boeing building down the street by NASA to collapse in on itself and the doors to be found 3 towns over.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

It would be quite something if the Everett assembly building collapsed like a circus tent.

Largest building by volume in the world.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_Everett_Factory

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

The irony of not being able to spiral downward, when spiraling downward.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wait what, they are still up there ?

Wasn't it supposed to be postponed for just a few days so they can analyze the leaks and 'please move along nothing to see here'.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

I had the same reaction a couple days ago when I saw they were still there. Definitely not a good look for Boeing.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

boeing should have all contracts cancelled and be broken up. every gov't. official that OK'd the starliner and this mission should be fired and investigated.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

A top option should also be removing the current Boeing board and C suite. What a debacle.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Your wish is granted.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/31/investing/boeings-losses-new-ceo/index.html

As announced earlier key board members are also resigning.

Have they rotated the deck chairs on the Titanic, or is this a meaningful change?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Well, time for the emergency knotted rope I guess.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Y’know one of those “options” was not to send it after the leaks were discovered.

Then they were all like, “Pffft. It’s fiiine. Just go.”

Then they were up there all, “Okay, so, slight delay”

Then, “Okay well that’s borked, but don’t worry, it’s all being handled.”

Now it’s “Options, anyone? Yes, all of them.”

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (15 children)

But don't worry though, NASA says the astronauts are "not stranded".

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Yes, these headlines are continuing to say the astronauts are stranded, which really isn't the case. This vehicle is working well enough to return them at any time.

The thing is, there is something weird going on with some of the thrusters (of which there are many for redundancy) and this is their only chance to investigate the issue. If they were to return with the astronauts now, it would mean leaving the thrust module to burn up in the atmosphere, and then we wouldn't be able to test the problematic parts. We could still do that (leave now), but we'd miss out on this opportunity to test hardware and understand better why some thrusters failed.

On the other hand, this is still a huge waste of money and it's one more example of Boeing bungling things. So I'm not saying this is a great situation, just that the astronauts are not actually "stranded".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps if they released some clue what they are learning, and what weeks 9, 10, 11, and 12 will reveal about the problem. Around week 4 this was a PR disaster and the silence is speaking even if they aren’t.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Well, the aerospace industry is not really known for moving quickly... But then Boeing collects a paycheck either way, so they don't seem to be in any particular hurry.

But I don't know, I'm not sure it's a pr disaster, I mean it's no worse than it usually is up there. We've had a Soyuz that sprang a leak and started venting atmosphere. We've had random helium leaks into crew compartments. We've run out of working eva suits. We've had resupply missions that never actually made it all the way to orbit, we've had a lot of non-critical internal equipment failures.

It's a real challenge keeping everything working, this is just one example of how things can go wrong. (Though admittedly, not a lot has really ever gone right with Starliner.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Boeing doesn’t listen to their engineers, but we’re supposed to listen to their marketing department.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I am seriously upset. NASA press office seems to be telling lies left and right, and they think they're just pulling the old Washington spin cycle, but it's obvious lies. And they're easy out of line.

They issued a 248k "emergency" engineering study contract to SpaceX to support extra pax on the dragon. NASA press office claimed this award had absolutely nothing to do with Crew Test, but this was immediately contradicted by anonymous internal sources.

Heads need to roll at NASA PAO.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Boeing is going to kill our astronauts. Enough of this.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Two "not stranded" astronauts becoming increasingly stranded. More at 6

load more comments
view more: next ›