this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
57 points (98.3% liked)

Greentext

4368 readers
2195 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I am one again asking you to read a different book

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What about time travel? They had a pocket time travel device and they couldn't strangle baby Voldemort? Or was there some Avengers endgame multi dimension thing preventing that?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What's wrong with it is that JKR is not smart enough to wing everything and have it make sense. As a result... it doesn't, much.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It makes enough sense for kids and adults who can suspend disbelief enough to keep turning the pages. And gives all of us reason to listen to some of the many podcasts exploring the plot holes.

Side note, now that I’ve commented a few times in this thread without mentioning it:

JKR is not smart enough to

refrain from using her global platform to attack trans people. Bad Rowling, bad! I’m thankful I can separate artists from art enough to still enjoy something I grew up enjoying but do have a duty to call out her grievously public stance on this so readers know we still fancy ourselves as allies even when stooping to discuss what the now-monster created.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There's no artistic value to be gained from reading Slaveowner Potter

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ever see boomers writing “cRAP”?

Feels like a literary riff on that, gotta say. The whole thread’s about worldbuilding shortcomings but we’re still here discussing it aren’t we? Clearly it made an impact.

Also - made me think of seeing a Jackson Pollock

& dismissively muttering “I could do that”

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There's entertainment and thought to be gained, but it's not of value. It's neoliberal shit. The books aggressively push a certain set of political beliefs which suck.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A net increase in pleasure, or decrease in suffering, in sentient beings.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

that is an effect, not a definition

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, it's a definition. I'm a utilitarian, so I only value pleasure and avoiding suffering.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

but what about a general definition of value that encapsulates everyone's experiences and not only yours?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't care who experiences the pleasure or suffering. Individual ego is an illusion. The self is a social construct. The divisions between oneself and others are a lie.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

you misunderstand. you told me what you value. I asked for a definition of value. something can be valuable (by being valuable to someone else) even if you yourself do not value it

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

Why would I agree that Harry Potter is valuable if I don't and cannot value it, even for its net effect on others?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Wait, the reason they don't use this potion is that it's hard to make?

Wouldn't you make it once and use it to make more by just dumping random ingredients in a pot to get an infinite supply? It seems like the wishing for more wishes situation pretty straight up.

This is what I get for letting you trick me into thinking about this dumb thing, I suppose.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

It was also toxic if you used it frequently

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Naw

Would crack you all out

But it makes no sense it’s not consistently used as much as possible, exactly below the threshold for negative side effects. Anytime the good guys are fighting the bad guys. Anytime the bad guys are searching for good guys or trying to evade them. Whoever managed their liquid luck use better should’ve won.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I thought the problem with that was that the side effects and duration are a bit unpredictable, so you can't optimize use where you can be sure you're acting under Felix and going with the flow is optimal vs it having worn off but you're still giddy and reckless and going with the flow is fatal.

Though ocme or think of it I may have got that idea from a fanfic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh I like that nerf! I think when it’s wearing off of Harry he just feels less and less lucky until he returns to normal. I only remember abuse leading to giddiness and recklessness. But that’s fun and appropriate!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

what's wrong? that bigot terf

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Also in the wizarding world they have a device that makes it incredibly easy to kill a baby. It's called a knife.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Technically with the mother's love protecting him, nothing would've worked. Also you are ignoring pride in all of this. Voldemort had a way to kill anyone he hated with barely any effort on his part, using magical abilities. He also hated muggles and all they stood for. Of course he won't be using a way muggles kill one another if he has magic that is in his mind "better".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

shame none of the other characters were loved by their mothers

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›