this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
57 points (98.3% liked)

Greentext

4375 readers
1416 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A net increase in pleasure, or decrease in suffering, in sentient beings.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

that is an effect, not a definition

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, it's a definition. I'm a utilitarian, so I only value pleasure and avoiding suffering.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

but what about a general definition of value that encapsulates everyone's experiences and not only yours?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't care who experiences the pleasure or suffering. Individual ego is an illusion. The self is a social construct. The divisions between oneself and others are a lie.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

you misunderstand. you told me what you value. I asked for a definition of value. something can be valuable (by being valuable to someone else) even if you yourself do not value it

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

Why would I agree that Harry Potter is valuable if I don't and cannot value it, even for its net effect on others?