Maalus

Well, they aren't bomb experts so why would they make a judgement call on that? The rules are there for a reason - maybe someone made a bomb that a fish could swim in.

It's there under "power hammer"

That's just Garak and his friend Garak

Because there have been motor vehicles in Warcraft since forever.

It's not really "their coast". Also I am against all forms of terrorism or warfare.

And yes, even the Israeli vessels that are heading for Israel.

No they aren't, go away.

They aren't just targetting military targets. Also it literally says in the synopsis that they are extorting civillian vessels. They aren't freedom fighters, they are terrorists with an excuse.

Your blood would literally boil the second you are exposed to the vacuum of space. You are dead long before you reach it. Maybe if they fire you off in a torpedo. But then some mutineer could fuck with the targetting systems and keep you alive.

There is no case to sue them. It's the management responsibility, not the workers to assign work. They don't need to go out seeking it.

You say that straight people aren't bullied for being straight, and yet the straight tag is in quotation marks and costs 9999 instead of 75. Which is bullying compared to other tags.

I myself am bi. I would never "wear" a badge saying that. But I understand people that would want to. I also understand people who would want to wear a straight badge. And saying that the only reason to wear one is to be reactionary to gay pride and to "be a counter movement" feels like gatekeeping people away from their sexual identity. I don't want "straight" to be "normal" and "gay" to be "abnormal". Assumptions ruin this world and lead to stereotypes.

It's not someone who is learning, because "how to avoid race conditions" is like java concurrency 101. The entire thing is made to prevent that shit from happening. And it is incredibly easy to setup a "happens before" relationship.

I don't get this either. Like, they tell people to vote Harris, despite her having a shitty pro-genocide policy. Instead, she could've said "enough", stopped the genocide, and I could be telling people to suck it up and vote for her despite her being against genocide. Which world would be a better place? Of course the one where Palestinians get to live.

But apparently that's something that's unthinkable