"They don't make them like they used to."
Yeah dad, you are right. You are far less likely to die.
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
"They don't make them like they used to."
Yeah dad, you are right. You are far less likely to die.
Really not true about diesels. DPF is a common problem but didn't even exist in early diesels. Mechanics hate DPFs. Maybe true about petrols.
But EV are better still (if you can have a home charger) and weren't really a thing in the 80s/90s. Bar milk floats.
I'm not a car guy and I really can't even tell if you responded to the right comment or if it just makes so little sense to me I wouldn't know either way.
I'm not a car guy, but I am the son of one and have plenty of gear head friends. DPF is Diesel Particulate Filter. It basically catches all the soot and then, when it's full enough, and the DPF is hot enough, there is a fuel injector that injects fuel and burns it all out. That's called a regen. When see white smoke, that's probably what you are seeing. If the DPF gets clogged, the engine won't start as it can't exaughst. So being able to regen is important. To get up to temperature to regen, the diesel needs to be run hard for about 10-15 minutes. Which it will get on a decent speed trip. DPFs came in to make diesels less dirty. Though you can argue it's moving the problem as much as reducing it. It's illegal but common, to bypass DPFs when it starts being an issue.
I know all this because it was the DPF that killed my last diesel.
Very widely held view that diesels were more reliable without DPFs. That they aren't good for the mileage they were pre-DPFs. Of course they were also even dirtier.
Is making cars like 10x times as expensive as it was in 2005? Games justify greed mongering technique like that by their companies claiming they take much more money to make than they did in 2005 when the switch to $60 dollar big budget games happened.
In 1991 we paid around $60 for the best Nintendo NES video games (we had 22% VAT at the time in my country). That's roughly $127 adjusted for inflation.
Early video-games were very expensive
As someone who rode in cars in the 80s, cars today are superior in every possible way.
Prove it
My car in the 80s didn't have an airbag.
Good talk.
Car in the 80s/90s: "Leaded Normal, Leaded Plus, or Leaded Super?"