SCB

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -5 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Yes this is an argument in my favor, you just don't understand AI/LLMs enough to know why.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago (7 children)

That's certainly an opinion you have

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (4 children)

the people stealing data

No one is doing this

Output doesn’t matter since it’s pretty well settled it’s not derivative work

Cool, discussion over.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (6 children)

I agree. For instance, it should be secured in law that you can train AI on anything, to avoid frivolous discussions like this.

Output is what should be moderated by law.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (10 children)

If it's not a violation of copyright then this is a non-issue. You don't need permission to read books.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

at their expense

How?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (8 children)

Why do you have free reign to do the same?

AIs don’t learn as a human would, and comparisons can’t be made between the learning processes.

I think you're going to have a hard time proving a financial distinction between them

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (12 children)

There's a third solution you're overlooking.

3: OpenAI (or other) wins a judgment that AI content is not inherently a violation of copyright regardless of materials it is trained upon.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Pandas only evolutionary advantage is being adorable. It is like cows being delicious - without that, they'd simply cease to be.

Holy duck I love pandas.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Cool. I'm down with that.

view more: next ›