this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38969 readers
2353 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

President Volodymyr Zelensky believes that Ukraine's partners "are afraid of Russia losing the war" and would like Kyiv "to win in such a way that Russia does not lose," Zelensky said in a meeting with journalists attended by the Kyiv Independent.

Kyiv's allies "fear" Russia's loss in the war against Ukraine because it would involve "unpredictable geopolitics," according to Zelensky. "I don't think it works that way. For Ukraine to win, we need to be given everything with which one can win," he said.

His statement came on May 16 amid Russia's large-scale offensive in Kharkiv Oblast and ongoing heavy battles further east. In a week, Russian troops managed to advance as far as 10 kilometers in the northern part of Kharkiv Oblast, according to Zelensky.

MBFC
Archive

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I feel like for a number of the allies, their main goal has been to drain Russia of resources, even if it costs the lives of Ukrainians.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah although if Russia wins it'd involve "unstable geopolitics" too.

This could be a long war.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I said it many times before - no one wants this war to end except for Ukrainians. It's just a very profitable venture for the rest of the world.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

For the US maybe, but I don't think it is profitabel for Europe.

Refugees aren't cheap (even though ukrainian people might integrate easier than others and later add value), a good part of money for weapon purchases flows towards America since they have more immediate capacities, and long term we do want to integrate Ukraine, which means Europe will ultimately bear a significant chunk of rebuilding costs.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

Ukrainian refugees are great. They're highly educated, have high standards of work ethics and are just great people overall. I'm definitely biased as a person from xUSSR country who is also 1/4 Ukrainian myself, but I'm really glad to see more Ukrainians in Europe.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Putin will want it over. It's an embarrassment to him that Ukrainians don't want him and have resisted him so effectively.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

And lose all the money? Haha, no.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Kyiv’s allies “fear” Russia’s loss in the war against Ukraine because it would involve “unpredictable geopolitics,” according to Zelensky.

Is “unpredictable geopolitics” a euphemism for 'nuclear war'?

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

While we really don't want a state with thousands of nukes to splinter, I doubt that any policy writers in DC feel that way, given the eulogies they gave to Navalny, a guy who had politics somewhere around Mussolini's and made Putin look like a dove.

But also the fact that we have like 8000 tanks in the desert that we're not sending tells me that they'd rather fight Russia to the last drop of Ukrainian blood than actually break Russia so who knows.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

While we really don’t want a state with thousands of nukes to splinter

People said that would happen after the fall of the USSR too. Turns out treaties and agreements can do a lot to stop things like that quickly.

On the other hand, such an agreement is what Russia is violating right now.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

Russia didn't splinter with the fall of the USSR. People who had control of the nukes retained their control. And Ukraine was forced to move theirs to Russia.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This is and always has been a proxy war and a siege meant to exhaust Russian resources slowly and without rapidly escalating to more destructive methods.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How is it a proxy war if it was russia which started it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

People forgot quickly how hesitant the European countries were, and still are, to send equipment to Ukraine. Germany didn't send anything but helmets for a long while. They also cancelled North Stream, leading to increased inflation and lessened economic competitive viability. If anything, the proxy war is exhausting both Russian and European economies, with the US and China ready to scoop up the scraps in preparation for their intensifying trade war.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why would they? Much of Eastern Europe expects the US to step in for defense, and use that fact to justify lowering expenditure on their own military.

Sweden has that shit figured out though

Don’t fuck with the Swedish

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The European countries bordering Russia, i.e. the Baltics, Nordics and Eastern Europe, contribute a far bigger percentage of their GDP to aid Ukraine than the others (if you ignore the new policies of Slovakia and Hungary). The US and UK gives/sells the most weapons, but Ukraine is pretty much bankrolled by the EU/EEA.

The point is that the EU has sustained big economic losses from cutting ties with Russia, leading to movement of industry and production away from Europe and over to the other biggest economies.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, it’s a difficult situation. I haven’t looked at the recent numbers regarding European countries contributions and their own militarization, I’m sure they’ve drastically increased since the war started

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yes. Germany and many other European countries had little to none political support for investing in their militaries. Now they do, and it is going to be a problem later on. Capitalists want return on their investments, after all.

The EU is very much on the top of the global neocolonial food chain, but they were mostly (looking at you France) not doing like super a lot (looking at you UK and US) of "interventions" to secure their interests all over the world.*

* Most Western powers are part of NATO, which is its own can of worms. Still, Russia invading Ukraine has made support for NATO much more popular (see Sweden and Finland as case studies), and now the bloc is more consolidated than ever. The timing could not be worse with respect to the overtly fascist leaders gaining traction in the very same countries.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

great point re: contribute a far bigger percentage of their GDP to aid Ukraine than the others

Slovakia and Hungary

Will be fascinating to see what happens next with Slovakia. And Georgia's protests don't seem to be dimming either. Hungary... eh....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Everyone in Europe knows really well that there is a reactionary wind blowing through the lands. Historically, this has been conducive to conflict and war. The conditions are different right now than then, but I fear not enough.

I would love a different world order based on international cooperation in lieu of exploitation, but I do not see this as a probable outcome of tensions rising and reactionaries taking power.

It is definitely worth keeping an eye on the protofascist and overtly fascist movements gaining traction, since they pretty much tell us exactly how they are going to fuck things up.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately this is a big part of why the first big summer counter-offensive by Ukraine stalled; NATO delayed aid by just enough that it guarunteed the war would drag out.

Personally I think it's about money for the industrial military complex. If the war had ended quickly while Ukraine had men, momentum and the initiative it would mean less money for industrialists.

Even US generals like Patreaus were predicting the delay by the Biden admin on F-16s etc. would lead to a massively protracted conflict.

It makes one ashamed that when our country finally does have a righteous cause for our massive military complex our leaders are still playing grab ass trying to make a buck while Ukrainians are fighting to exist. It's one of Biden's (and NATOs) biggest failures.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

The insane amount of power that US military industrial complex has over our country and therefore the world is completely fucked.

Eisenhower was right.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Ukraine is already beaten. This is nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's been two years, mate. If Russia hasn't won yet, that means they can't.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

That's a poor analysis and untrue. Ukraine doesn't have the soldiers to defend their positions anymore. They will not be able to stop the Russian advance. You'll see soon enough. How many Ukrainians need to die still?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What's "Z" in this context?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Z = pro invasion russian

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ah an uncommon defeatist liberal still wanting to throw in the towel this many years later. I'm guessing you were posting that Ukraine would fall in 2 days at the start and then fearmongering every military aid delivery as setting off WWIII. Might I suggest finding a new hobby? Being consistently and repeatedly wrong over the last few years can't be good for your mental health.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago

All of your assumptions are wrong.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

Exactly. It's weird that people don't get this.