this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
237 points (84.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21143 readers
1508 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] [email protected] 118 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

    It's not that successful if the userbase hates it and would rather use a competitor.

    [–] [email protected] 52 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    For me it was a successful deterrent. Debian bookworm has been wonderful.

    [–] [email protected] 37 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    Yeah I love it, Debian feels like opening a featureless gray box that just says "OS" on the front. Add whatever you want. A blank canvas. It's as close to "generic" Linux as you can get.

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    I installed mint on my second PC, and it's great. I feel like migrating my main, but I'm not sure it would go smoothly. I've had a lot of issues with my four months old Ubuntu install, lately the keyboard is nonfunctional at the login screen about half the time. Snaps are another reason making me want to leave it behind.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 96 points 6 months ago

    I don't mind Snaps in a vacuum, but the unforgivable thing is that they messed with the package repo so that instead of installing a deb package as I intended, it installs a Snap stub which I did not want. If Canonical hadn't forced them on users in that way, I'd have been fine with them.

    Instead, back to Debian I went (sorry I ever left, actually)

    [–] [email protected] 71 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

    I mean I used to used to use Ubuntu for my server now I use Debian cos fuck snaps.

    [–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

    Ow! My brain!

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

    So I didn't realize that the snaps logo is an origami bird.

    "It was like a piece of self-opening origami, or a rosebud blooming into a rose in just a few seconds. Where just a few moments earlier there had been a smoothly curved black disk, there was now a bird. A bird, hovering there." - Douglas Adams, describing the Hitchhiker's Guide, Mk. II, from Mostly Harmless.

    A bit on the nose there, Canonical.

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

    Same, I used to always pick Ubuntu to spin up servers. Now I pick it never.

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

    The other day I tested Ubuntu just to see if it had gotten any better. It has become worse.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 43 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

    successful project

    That is a very biased claim. It's like saying that the PS5 is the most successful gaming platform because God Of War: Ragnarök and Ghost Of Tsushima players prefer it over Xbox and PC.

    load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 42 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    It’s not successful though. Like, maybe if your measure of success is that it’s usable, sure. But no other OSes have adopted it. Not even Ubuntu’s downstream OSes like Mint or Pop_OS!.

    Users don’t like it, vendors don’t like it, other OS maintainers don’t like it. I’m not sure why that would be considered successful.

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago

    I know why I hate snap, no confusion here.

    [–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    If you don't like snaps, don't use the distribution by the company who tries to establish them.

    [–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

    And also warn newcomers not to invest time into those distros.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    They also called unity successful at some point

    [–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Unity was a nice DE. Being on KDE since 12 years, I still miss some of its features, e.g. merging the menu items with the title bar.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    Yeah, I was pissed when they went away from it. It was great for small screen devices.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

    Nix, guix, flatpak, and OSI images are all better "universal" packages managers on sheer technical merits while also not be a vendor locked proprietary solution.

    Snaps are worse than what Redhat is doing.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Sheer* probably. Unless there a technical merit about cutting stuff.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago

    "Successful"

    [–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (7 children)

    snaps are a proprietary vendor-locked format, the only redeeming quality is being able to run them in cli (once Flatpak get that too, there is no valid reason for snaps to exist).

    I just find it midly infuriating (if that even is a thing, meaning I hate it but it's not that significant for me to distro hop on my work laptop) to have two "universal" package formats on my system with Canonical shoving the objectively worse one (from a free/libre pov) down my throat...

    load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    Former Unix security chief.

    Do not use snaps. Risky as hell.

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Why? I've heard this for years at this point, but as someone who rarely uses snaps because they're the only convenient option for software I'm using, I'm generally ambivalent about them.

    People seem to hold really strong opinions about snap but I've never been able to get a straight answer, just a bunch of hand waving.

    [–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    The one app I can't stand as a snap is firefox, it took a minute to navigate to the first webpage every time I start up. The rest are or more less fine I think, but flatpak meets my needs for most other applications.

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    Also command line tools are terrible as snaps. And the worst part is you have no idea why they won't work. It doesn't tell you that snap is the problem. It just doesn't work.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    It look me about two hours to realize that snap was the problem when I was trying to run Mastodon in a Docker container. That was the last straw before I moved to Fedora.

    Snap can’t read anything outside of the /home directory, and there’s no way to fix that except changing the source code and recompiling it.

    [–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    I'd be curious to see some statistics on how many Ubuntu users removed snaps vs how many haven't changed the default.

    [–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I’d bet most ubuntu user don’t know the difference between snap and deb, tho.

    [–] [email protected] 39 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    I didn't until apps started breaking. The snap version of steam, Firefox, and Unity (I think?) all started to have issues. When I googled around people would often ask "deb or snap"? I uninstalled the snap packages and installed the deb packages and most of my issues went away.

    I ultimately switched to Linux Mint because I kept having stability issues and I was just desperate for a solution. But snap was not a great experience for me.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    Exactly, wouldn't most of the people who really care already have moved on from Ubuntu?

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Upstart and Unity are waiting for you.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

    Don’t forget Mir!

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago

    When Mozilla provide the firefox deb package - Why not give it then? IMO snaps/flatpacks are slower to start, can't be updated while running, takes more diskspace, and takes longer time to update. With the isolation we also have different kind of problems - have you given it the correct permission?, and how do you get keepassxc browser extension to work with it(they dont support it)?

    [–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

    snap (especially firefox beeing one) made me an arch user

    [–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    So, I used ubuntu for pretty close to 20 years and it was my go to distro. I have had hundreds upon hundreds of servers running ubuntu.

    Last few years I've been moving away from ubuntu because of their lack of respect for their core users. They have no clear vision and when they do, its a magnificently shitty one like the donkey balls decision to enfrorce snap on everything.

    I will still have some ubuntu servers to take care of, but every new server I set up will be fedora.

    Because fuck snaps, thats why

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

    I had like 4 snaps installed in my system and it was hogging like 60Gb of storage. What the actual fuck.

    I wish I kept the names of the dependencies, I just ran a command to remove all snaps and the snap itself.

    Am I talking bullshit here? I saw my disk drop 60gb after I did that but I have no evidence.

    [–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    snap is OK vs compiling stuff.

    But it is bullshit that they "snapped" things like Firefox, which has a repo with .debs

    Edit: typo

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

    I hate having several package managers coexisting on my computer, and the only advantage of snap is that it solves a problem I've never encountered in 25 years.

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)
    [–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

    They forgot the halo.

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

    Personally, I use Debian and gravitate towards flat paks, but I'm starting to question whether this is just one of those hills Linux users arbitrarily choose to die on a la systemd/wayland? I suppose one of the advantages of an opinionated OS is a vast array of opinions

    [–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

    It's much worse.

    The snap store is proprietary.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    "But the Calamares versions have an install option without Snaps"

    Well that also doesnt have a webbrowser and will install snaps the second you want one

    load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›