this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
1871 points (99.2% liked)
Technology
59267 readers
3788 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It should be illegal to connect a touch screen to a computer that runs like a potato. Even computers in the 80s could respond to keystrokes and mouse clicks in real time.
If it keeps getting broken they might reconsider.
It seems to be a very popular mindset in software development that efficiency isn't as important because of how fast hardware has gotten.
This sucks because I don't get better hardware just to make up for worse software (not that it even does; a lot of browser-based apps are painfully slow), and some of these devs end up working on weaker platforms that don't make up for their shitty programming. They might not ever touch the platform it is actually supposed to run on and instead work on a dev machine that is powerful enough to make it look good. It's possible that neither them nor anyone hiring/managing them realizes that they aren't the kind of programmer they want.
Though it's also possible that the programmers are fine and have told their managers that the CPUs just aren't powerful enough for what they want them to do but some assholes are only looking at the bottom line and have low standards for these kind of things in their own life (my TV is slow, so it's no big deal that our car interface is slow).
Worst thing is it's probably less than a $50 difference in cost to switch to something that could handle it fine, assuming it's not programmed in JavaScript and HTML or slow because it's backend is on the cloud or some shit like that, which also wouldn't surprise me.
How's this for irony: I was hired at my current job as part of a team whose whole mission is to address performance problems in a large desktop app...that's written entirely in Typescript!
It's kinda funny how some are willing to develop a skill to great depth (you'd have to know JavaScript/TypeScript very well to write a full deal desktop application in it, and it probably involved a LOT of frustrating debug if performance is the main issue with it) but don't spend any time on breadth to understand that some depths aren't worth it.
We used to have a rule in computer system design that if an event would take more than 4 seconds we had to show a "waiting" icon like the hourglass.
Now though, people are sensitive to half a second between tap/click and something happening. Incidentally there's no reason for a fuel pump control to be slow, even running on a potato. The engineer who designed it wasn't given time to make it efficient