this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
149 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38631 readers
303 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And people still buy Apple products?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 55 points 5 days ago (6 children)

People discuss this as if they connected their phones to their computers more than once in the past 5 years.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago

Lemmy users can't fathom that average users aren't really bothered by it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I copy photos and videos off my phone all the time; it's far more convenient than trying to send it over the internet. But even the "slow" speed of 480Mbps that they're complaining about seems more than adequate; copying a few gigs of photos will only take a minute or two, and even copying my phone's entire 128GB of storage would only take 35 minutes. Compared to most USB storage devices that's blazingly fast.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

If I didnt use SMB at home and Immich to transfer pictures from my phone I would be very mad.
On my vacation I transfered videos from my action cam to my phone for cloud backup (no laptop with me).
It would be very inconvenient to have only USB2 speed available.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

I rarely take 128GB worth of photos at once so background iCloud sync is fast enough so that when I take a photo on my phone it’s visible on my Mac a minute or so after that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Ppl dont back up to local hd?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

They let iCloud do the thing. Their computers don’t have that much storage.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I backup to my computer. It actually has more storage than iCloud and I don’t trust any cloud with my private data.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I’m sure we’ll find much evidence for hobbyists on Lemmy having different use cases from the general public but Apple wasn’t ever interested in supporting that niche at budget prices because there’s little money to be made there.

Regular person doesn’t need much offline storage because they download apps from the App Store, listen to music from a streaming service and sync photos to iCloud or Google Photos. Those people probably shouldn’t store their data offline either way because they won’t back it up properly. It’s another case of Apple treating general public like incompetent grannies but they’re kind of right about that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Apple wasn’t ever interested in supporting that niche at budget prices because there’s little money to be made there.

Not true. Difference in cost between USB 2&3 is negligible. They've just done this to create artificial value for the "Pro" models. Same way they create artificial value with ram and storage.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

They've just done this to create artificial value for the "Pro" models.

Correct. They found out professionals have money to afford premium hardware and software so you can charge them that. Perfectly reasonable way to make money, little competition in that space as opposed to general purpose budget stuff.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You may have glossed over the part where I said this is not premium hardware. Even bargain basement Android phones come with USB3. They've gone out of their way to ensure their less expensive (but still very expensive) devices have bad hardware.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Going by number of features isn’t really a way to tell what’s premium. For me the bar is set really low which is not having ads, which most budget Android phones fail at.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

We are not going by "number of features", we're "going by" one specific feature.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

I back mine up to my own cloud. Wirelessly 😅

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Meanwhile me sitting with 4tb on my laptop and 5gb on icloud because fuck paying for cloud storage

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

4TB?
Maybe more like 6 times that (for me) :D

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You have 24TB storage in your laptop? How?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

By mounting it from my NAS :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well, that's cheating! In that case I have like 120TB.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

At least we both can hoard as much as we want.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Like media share to home server?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I use ghost commander to backup to the NAS. No wires.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh i see. How's the transfer speed?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I get 6mB /s or so, but it copies in the background. I also use it to copy media to my phone.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Yeah I could see this work if not in a rush.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, there is a great app for photos though, photosync

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Thanks for the info!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

There is at least 1 use case for it: some of the newer iPhones can shoot raw format video. Apple calls this ProRes. It is also possible to take those videos as large as 4K. This comes out to about 6GB per minute of video taken.

Imagine someone like a YouTuber decided to take a couple of 20-30 minute clips. Yeah, I wouldn’t want to wait for wireless transfer on that. Especially not if that is a regular thing someone does.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

If you make money on YouTube you can afford iPhone Pro probably. You probably already have one for shooting quality video because what else is there at this budget?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Yeah. I did it exactly once, on vacation, while I didn’t have internet connection/didn’t want to waste the rest of my data, and wanted to import photos to my MacBook to edit them. It was fast enough on the Lightning connector.

This is a complete non-issue especially since faster hardware would probably be more expensive. Apple has enough actual issues that are more important such as repairs, RAM pricing, sideloading, …

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Wired screen mirroring would be a nice use case. E.g. just plug the iphone in a USB dock and watch a movie or join a meeting.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This works already on Pro and non pro models.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

Thank you. It appears that even the USB-2.0 models support video output.