this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
758 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

70214 readers
27 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (5 children)

It's not weirdly used. Society always determines what is appropriate. We've decided, as a society, that humans cannot consent until 18. And any sex without consent is rape.

That said, what is weird is that we conflate pedo and child rapist. You're describing child rapists.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Get the fuck out, man.

Teenagers fuck each other all the time, consensually.

So there goes your argument about people younger than 18 being incapable of giving consent.

For the record, I'm in my 40s and I wouldn't go out with anyone below the age of 30, before someone accuses me of anything I ain't.

I hate predators as much as the next person, but let's not go over to the other extreme.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Children can't consent. Teenagers fucking is without consent. Their brains, on the average, are not capable of making that level of decision.

But that doesn't make it illegal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The issue here is that most countries define the age of consent differently. I think we can agree that when a 16 year old agrees to sexual contact with another 16 year old, the dynamic is different than if they agree to it with a 40 year old. Absolutely. But that does not mean that the 16 year old doesnt understand what they are doing.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Indeed. It's based on each society. That said, I remember myself at 16. I in no way understood the risk/reward of my choices. It probably took me to 25 to be what I would consider fully conscious.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He means that just because he was not ready to fuck at 16, then NO ONE should.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

What about the 25 part, that was the moat bizarre part

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What are you a fucking religious nutjob? Or worse, a fucking AI?

I'm doing pointing out how moronic and ignorant this stand is.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I didn't say they shouldn't fuck, feisty pants. I said they can't consent. Consent is a legal term.

They can and should fuck as much as they want. They just can't provide consent.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Except that they can provide consent. In the U.S. alone: https://www.ageofconsent.net/states

So, some states allow it, some don't. But there you have it. In some states (and countries), under 18 people can consent. Now, show me how you're going to move the goalpost now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nope. In those locations it's fine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Ok, friend. In that case, we're on the same page.

Teens of a certain age can consent. But I agree that some 40 year old wanting and attempting to have sex with a 17 year old is a fucking depraved predator trying to take advantage of inexperience.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

We’ve decided, as a society, that humans cannot consent until 18.

Older criminal laws were based on that idea, usually called "statutory rape". Modern laws about sexual abuse of children usually ignore the concept of consent entirely to allow for more nuance.

One example of nuance is exceptions for people close in age so that non-abusive relationships between teenagers don't suddenly become crimes when someone has a birthday. Another is that consent is often a factor in the severity of the penalty.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yes and that's completely fair. It's about the imbalance of power. An 18 y.o. and one day, is exactly the same as they were two days prior.

But the cutoff has to be somewhere, and the guy I was replying to was talking about proper adults and 16 y.o.

That's a highschool sophomore. And I think we'd all agree a sophomore dating a college student would be pretty imbalanced.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

And I think we’d all agree a sophomore dating a college student would be pretty imbalanced.

I was a college student at 17, but I think you had a larger age difference in mind. I do think we can all agree there should be laws against adults sexually exploiting teenagers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Somebody should tell society their laws need to catch up with that decision!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Your society might have in mine a 14 year old can consent and it wouldn't be considered rape in that case, still a crime though.