Excellent Reads

1738 readers

108 users here now

Are you tired of clickbait and the current state of journalism? This community is meant to remind you that excellent journalism still happens. While not sticking to a specific topic, the focus will be on high-quality articles and discussion around their topics.

Politics is allowed, but should not be the main focus of the community.

Submissions should be articles of medium length or longer. As in, it should take you 5 minutes or more to read it. Article series’ would also qualify.

Rules:

Common Sense. Civility, etc.
Server rules.
Please either submit an archive link, or include it in your summary.

Other comms that might be of interest:

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

In an Age of Right-Wing Populism, Why Are Denmark’s Liberals Winning? (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Around the world, progressive parties have come to see tight immigration restrictions as unnecessary, even cruel. What if they’re actually the only way for progressivism to flourish?

That the era of low immigration was also the era of progressive triumph is no coincidence. [...] The United States felt more like a cohesive nation to many voters, with higher levels of social trust and national pride, and politicians were able to enact higher taxes on the rich and new benefits like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

How so? Aren't those who seek asylum those who disagree with their country's societal atmosphere? Why would someone impose their beliefs on a radically different place they've just settled to?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

You're completely and utterly ignorant on this.

Ex-Muslims for example have a LOT of issues with a lot of their "fellow" immigrants who abandoned absolutely none of the beliefs and behaviors that made it difficult to live in their country of origin, including harsh treatment and violence against any Middle Eastern looking person recklessly brave enough to not pretend to be at least moderately religious.

A sizable portion of immigrants tend not to disagree with the "social atmosphere" of their original country, and tend to move purely for practical, often financial reasons. From what I've seen there's a lot of "Technically this place has better results, but I don't really agree with how they got there. Too much alcohol, too many sluts and gays, too permissive." or similar sentiments from that part of the demographic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Because that's how humans are. I'm an immigrant myself, and trust me I've asked myself the same question so many times. People move to get away from horrible conditions in their home country, then immediately set to recreating the factors that caused those horrible conditions in the first place. Most people just don't make the logical leap between their beliefs and the end results.