Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
I bought my current place a year and a half ago - it was the fourth one I'd had an offer in on and the previous three had major structural issues (turns out 100+ year old houses built on same are a nightmare), at least two had subsidence. I have friends and family in the building trade and they reckon they'd be wary - houses like a that reach a point where, to continue for another century, they either need to get snapped up by a builder who can get the work done and flip it or someone highly motivated who can take on a project like this.
Your mileage might differ but I'd just spent 6 months and 50 grand putting the previous house on a raft of concrete that would outlast the next I've Age which was then used as a stick to beat us down on the price. So I was not in the right frame of mind to undertake another building project. And that's what you should ask yourself - are you the kind of person that thrives on camping in their new house for months getting work done (and getting builders is trickier after the pandemic and more expensive)? What's your budget like because this is the stuff the survey found but tearing into the place could reveal more? It has clearly not been well-maintained for a long time and there's likely to be all sorts of other issues.
What level of survey did you have done? Have you had a structural engineer look it over?
You're clearly up north! If they aren't prepared to negotiate then everyone should walk, if they weren't prepared to come down closer to £50-60k then I'd definitely consider walking, as the modest savings don't outweigh the stress. To be honest, if it were me, I'd be long gone already. Just reading this is giving me flashbacks.
We went for a full survey, the guy is RICS-registered but fairly young so assume he's pricing cheap to get plenty of jobs and reviews under his belt. He did recommend a specific separate cavity inspection but at this point it feels like I'm probably going to be chucking more money down the drain considering all the other issues.
Correct haha. Someone else said that a reduction of 15k is almost unheard of. Tbh I already was having a bad feeling, and reading all these responses has really crystalised that I simply cannot buy this house without a massive reduction... and even then it's going to be a shitload of hassle, potentially more expenses that haven't yet been uncovered. Will see what they say once we have the full report in writing. I don't mind roughing it a bit, but managing a project like this I would think isn't really in my wheelhouse and will be very stressful.
Thanks for your advice.
Yeah, they're chartered surveyors, you'd be wise to get a structural engineer to look it over if you were thinking of having underpinning and they might spot other things. I stopped getting chartered surveyors and asked a structural engineer I know to do the surveys - they a lot harsher.
Percentage wise it's a big chunk of change but, depending on the amount of underpinning required, it might not be enough.
If the underpinning is not accessible from outside the floors will have to come up. Cracks in the walls may have to be dealt with by removing the plaster and tying the bricks back together then replastering. Depending on where the damp is coming from you might need a new roof - did they get up there or use a drone?
And money aside, this should be your deciding factor.
The surveyor said he was actually surprised to find the roof in quite good condition... seems like at least one area where it's either been properly maintained, or had very high-quality work performed.
I'll definitely do some shopping around for structural engineers in the area for future surveys, might as well go in deep for the most expensive & important issues before moving forward with any future potential purchase. Great advice, thanks.