politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
We know. What we don't know is why are all civil servants just rolling over, instead of applying simple sabotage.
How would sabotage help when destroying the government is Musk's and Trump's goal?
It slows them down. Which is what we can hope for, until people get a bit more organized into other forms of resistance.
It's easy to volunteer other people, but these are civil servants who inherently believe in the rule of law by default. That programming in itself makes it hard to go against this lifelong belief in doing things by the book.
I hope they can do what they can to resist, but I also don't believe this is on them either. If the former President in a position of power couldn't put the brakes on this shit; if we as a society couldn't put the brakes on this on November 5th... Well, my expectations are very low. Things will have to come crashing down hard until the apathetic and ignorant wake up, I suspect.
Most simple sabotage is doing things EXACTLY by the book... Civil servants often take shortcuts to expedite things. They should take ZERO shortcuts.
Elon toadie asks for a set of creds. Demand Toadie get all appropriate forms completed, first, and then demand documented procedure for obtaining those creds are followed TO THE LETTER. No rush jobs. No prodding the ticket holder for updates. Just exactly like the book says to do it.
Just an example.
This is called "work to rule" and it is one of the most classic kinds of industrial action, pretty much one step short of a strike.
It also means risking their livelihood, which I expect in many cases is an even greater deterrent than an aversion to rule breaking.
The same reason most of us decline our ample opportunities for sabotage every day. Someone else should do it.
Well, that changes, the more people do it. And I am not going to brag here about what I've done, but at least once a day, I do something to put a wrench in a cog.
Whose saying they are all rolling over?
Their actions? How else do websites vanish? Whiy aren't we getting livetracks on Elon's location, or his toadies? Where are the server crashes?
Lmao, so you are asking “where are the server crashes,” in the same statement acknowledging sites have been removed. How often do you see server crashes of things that have been deleted?
No, I mean crashes if the Whitehouse web sites.... or breaking the auth systems for Trump officials... or delaying fleet vehicle reservations for motorcades so they come up short, or have to cancel....
The only way these things can happen so fast is by civil servants just doing what they are told.
I imagine a lot of people just don’t want to go to jail. Considering there’s substantial criminal penalties (for everyone that’s not a billionaire) to take out a website or anything else you mentioned - that’s my guess.
There are myriad ways to take something offline, which is easily plausible as an "oops" moment. There are also myriad tarpits to send requests to.
My old job, if I wanted to totally de-rail a project? I'd push it over to the project management office, and then to the infosec office. Almost guaranteed, the project would fail, because of those two tarpits.
Get a special request? Schedule a meeting for 4 business days out. Spend 1/3 of the meeting catching up and socializing. Spend 1/3 pre-planning the next meeting. Spend 1/3 laying out all the issues needing to be solved, and "circle back" when we get "scheduling lined up"...
And then it gets restored from backup 20 minutes later while you look incompetent to your peers and supervisors.
If you really want to take it down you need to be systematically deleting or corrupting backups for several months; then take it down.
That requires destruction of govt property (up to 20 years in jail).
Oh damned.... for some reason the last 4 backups failed... Crap.
Regardless, it's 20 minutes of outage. And sure, you look incompetent to your peers and supers, who hopefully, would be on your side, anyways. Or, they are Fascist Toadies, and it's best you look incompetent. How can someone incompetent sabotage anything?
No, it doesn't. It requires a few days of not checking a misconfigured backup job. And the misconfiguration is just an "oops", easily explained away.
How can someone incompetent stay employed in their current role?
If peers and supers are on your side, actions would not need to be explained through incompetence. If peers and supers are not on your side they are going to get rid of you with expediency. Then you can't do shit either way. For the most part, people don't really know who is who.
I guess we'll just have to re-deply from git. No big deal.
Intentionally deleting backups is 100% destruction of govt. property. If we're talking about simply a "few days" of backups, it's also not going to do anything meaningful. There's been pretty much no new development on anything since Jan 20th, so we'd need to be getting rid of backups substantially earlier than that.
Either way, I think you mean well with your inquiry. Hopefully this can help with understanding. >>>
It's not like that's on the horizon, anyways.
Ok, cool! They can explain away, and help make the "oops" more plausible...
That is happening, anyways. Thankfully, Public Servants are unionized.
If it's up to date... Of course, you can slow walk the restores, or even re-deploys.... Again, at best, my example was a 20 minute outage. But it's still an outage.
Ok, so just "accidentally hit a key, and have it back up the wrong directory, and forget to check backup reports..."
I fully understand what I'm saying. And I fully understand what Simple Sabotage means. It doesn't mean you will be the single thing that stops the machine... But you can muck up the works.