this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
671 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19961 readers
3597 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the past week or so, the courts have begun to try to set some boundaries on the Musk–Miller–Trump administration’s early blitz of recklessness.

. . .

This judicial review provides at least a small reprieve, hope that some of the administration’s most destructive impulses will be stopped. Or at least pared back. But even with the courts stepping up, and even with the reality of the administration’s ineptitude sinking in, this early Musk–Miller–Trump blitz remains very—maybe irreparably—damaging. Of course, there are a lot of moles to whack: the U.S. Agency for International Development and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are being dismantled at an alarming rate, and the court system is not known for being nimble. The administration is betting, perhaps rightly, that at least some of its thoughtless, lawless efforts will slip through the cracks.

But even if the courts caught them all—and even if every court facing each lawless escapade said, “Nope, that’s not a thing”—still the entire process would be doing serious damage to our institutions. Think of it as someone spoofing your identity and going on a shopping spree with your credit cards. Even if the goon gets caught, you still have to go store by store to argue that the fraudulent purchase wasn’t legitimate and hope the debt is forgiven. And all the while, perhaps long after all the debts are dealt with, the torrent of uncertainty kills your credit score.

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

And then it gets restored from backup 20 minutes later while you look incompetent to your peers and supervisors.

If you really want to take it down you need to be systematically deleting or corrupting backups for several months; then take it down.

That requires destruction of govt property (up to 20 years in jail).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

And then it gets restored from backup 20 minutes later while you look incompetent to your peers and supervisors.

Oh damned.... for some reason the last 4 backups failed... Crap.

Regardless, it's 20 minutes of outage. And sure, you look incompetent to your peers and supers, who hopefully, would be on your side, anyways. Or, they are Fascist Toadies, and it's best you look incompetent. How can someone incompetent sabotage anything?

That requires destruction of govt property (up to 20 years in jail).

No, it doesn't. It requires a few days of not checking a misconfigured backup job. And the misconfiguration is just an "oops", easily explained away.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

How can someone incompetent sabotage anything?

How can someone incompetent stay employed in their current role?

If peers and supers are on your side, actions would not need to be explained through incompetence. If peers and supers are not on your side they are going to get rid of you with expediency. Then you can't do shit either way. For the most part, people don't really know who is who.

Oh damned… for some reason the last 4 backups failed… Crap.

I guess we'll just have to re-deply from git. No big deal.

No, it doesn’t. It requires a few days of not checking a misconfigured backup job. And the misconfiguration is just an “oops”, easily explained away.

Intentionally deleting backups is 100% destruction of govt. property. If we're talking about simply a "few days" of backups, it's also not going to do anything meaningful. There's been pretty much no new development on anything since Jan 20th, so we'd need to be getting rid of backups substantially earlier than that.

Either way, I think you mean well with your inquiry. Hopefully this can help with understanding. >>>

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago

How can someone incompetent stay employed in their current role?

It's not like that's on the horizon, anyways.

If peers and supers are on your side, actions would not need to be explained through incompetence.

Ok, cool! They can explain away, and help make the "oops" more plausible...

If peers and supers are not on your side they are going to get rid of you with expediency.

That is happening, anyways. Thankfully, Public Servants are unionized.

I guess we’ll just have to re-deply from git. No big deal

If it's up to date... Of course, you can slow walk the restores, or even re-deploys.... Again, at best, my example was a 20 minute outage. But it's still an outage.

Intentionally deleting backups is 100% destruction of govt. property.

Ok, so just "accidentally hit a key, and have it back up the wrong directory, and forget to check backup reports..."

Either way, I think you mean well with your inquiry. Hopefully this can help with understanding.

I fully understand what I'm saying. And I fully understand what Simple Sabotage means. It doesn't mean you will be the single thing that stops the machine... But you can muck up the works.