this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
199 points (99.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44331 readers
947 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was going through my Wal-Mart+ subscription plan that I got for free and I saw their offers. One of which was EMeals, that was a 60-day trial. I thought that this was like Blue Apron or other meal delivery services so I thought I'd take a crack at it and hope that it would get me on a path to eat better.

Turns out, it's just a meal planner. And it's absurd to me why and how would anyone pay for something when there are countless and countless recipes and meal planners readily available for free. Who'd the fuck would want to pay for a planner? That's like paying for a calendar app.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How is it surprising people pay for operating systems? The vast majority of computers sold are bundled with an operating system license, and most people just use what came with the computer.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Because they pay for a worse experience.

[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Uhhhh you answered your own question. Why pay for an OS when it should either be included, or free Linux.

Therefore it's surprising when people pay for an OS.

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I use windows. I haven't paid for a windows key since windows 7 iirc. Windows has been free for years. (I know you pay with your data etc. Good luck convincing average Joe who uses all social media services that this even matters)

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Sames. I haven't paid for a Windows OS since Windows XP.

The only way I ever got to the latest Windows OS, is either being given a machine with the latest version on it or I get a PC built but pirate a serial or a copy.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Exactly. Which is why it's surprising to pay for windows OS.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Where are these surprising purchases then? People either use it for free, in which case they haven't paid for it, or they bought it in a bundle with their PC, which is again very common.

Who is actually buying Windows standalone?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who is actually buying Windows standalone?

People who build their own PC and want to use an OS that they are familiar with. Especially when you want to game, windows is just easier than any free os and you can get a legit key for 20-30 bucks, while pirating windows has become a lot more complicated since XP.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Every time I saw someone I know built a PC, they reused the license key from their previous one. And the first one was a free key from their university.

It definitely happens though!

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Exactly. You can buy windows OS standalone without it coming in a package with a pc. It's rare. That's why it's surprising.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Fair enough. To me the fact people don't do it and that it's rare is perfectly expected. In other words, I would be surprised if people commonly did that, but they don't, so I don't see anything surprising. But I can see your point of view, it's looking at it a bit differently.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But "included" doesn't mean free. You still paid for it.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's not the point. You're buying a pc, it comes with it and sometimes costs extra.

This sub is about what's surprising things people buy. Buying an OS is surprising, because it's either part of the package deal for a new pc, or you can just use linux.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I think what you are trying to say is "buying an OS not as part of a package deal is surprising". To that I would agree.

But most people are buying an OS as part of a package deal, so most purchases of an OS are not surprising.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not "trying" to say anything lol. OP said operating systems. I'm talking about operating systems. Not a pc that is packaged with one.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I'm talking about operating systems. Not a pc that is packaged with one.

So yes, looks like I correctly understood what you are trying to say, and agree with you that buying a standalone operating system is weird. But nobody does that.

Looks like you consider buying something in a bundle to not be buying it, which is a valid opinion, though myself I disagree. Most OS purchases happen in a bundle with a PC, and every time I bought a laptop I asked for Windows to be removed from the bundle, which made it cheaper a bit (as I was going to install Linux anyway). If removing Windows from the bundle is making it cheaper, then clearly you were buying it and paying for it for when you don't, as most people do.