this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
159 points (97.6% liked)
Technology
61456 readers
4084 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Does that mean the other states can get back to baitin' too?
I've never understood that shit. State a bans something, states b, c, d, and e also ban it. Federal judge comes in and says "state c cannot ban that. It's unconstitutional," how and why does that not apply to the others as well? It makes no fucking sense. Our country is fucking weird
Law is all about nuance. Two states don't have the same word for word law.
I know, but these are federal judges stating that the ban cannot go through because it violates federal law, is it not? Or am I misunderstanding and they are federal judges saying that TNs law violates TN own state constitution?
At least now the other states can use this as precident that it's unconstitutional.
Only if they're master of their own domain.
No