322
Frostpunk creators cancel "Project 8" and lay off staff amid concerns that "narrative-driven, story-rich games" don't sell
(www.rockpapershotgun.com)
this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
322 points (97.4% liked)
Games
32940 readers
896 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Cyberpunk 2077, RDR2 still wasn't that long ago, Dragon Age Veilguard was actually a success convincing even EA, Star Wars Jedi series, the list goes on. It just has to be a good story, you can't just slap some boring ass story in there.
Odd to say Veilguard was a success when from what I can tell, one of the few things uniting the very fractured and divided gaming community this year was that the writing in Veilguard was horrible. And you know that's true when the various members of that community can give their own varied reasons why the writing was horrible and they would all be valid.
I only see that in some communities. Most of the people that hate on veilguard, from what I've seen, either haven't played the game or are clipping parts out of context.
The complaints I've seen that aren't "dur hur, binary qunari" talk about the shaky dialogue in the beginning, where things felt awkward and clunky, like a new team forming. I'll give credence to the complaints about some depth being lost in the characters versus other games in the series, but I think those people feel that way because Inquisituon was a bloated mess (that I love) and they've played 1 and 2 so many times in different ways they're meshing all the dialogue into one. Playing through veilguard a second time, and watching my partner take different choices than me, made the characters on par with Mass Effect 2 allies. Which, I'd say isn't an accomplishment so much as a mild chastisement that it hasn't improved since then.
I enjoyed every Dragon-age game so far and Veilguard is no exception. I think the writing is fine. Not great, but good enough. I can see why some people would complain, because it's definitely watered down compared to DA:O. But I am still having fun almost 60 hours into the game.
Someone still took the time to downvote your opinion that it 'was fine'. The vitriol towards any positive or neutral comment is why I think it's a specific group of people actually complaining, a fair share with "it could have been better, and it's not my style of rpg anymore", and the remainder just being relatively neutral to happy that they got more dragon age.
Haven't played, but I found this (negative) review compelling: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QF-Kd2BBpx8
He did play through the whole game.
But, to drive home in case it isn't clear, I love Dragon Age and I think this one ranks higher than Inquisition (but not trespasser DLC), on par with 2, and above 1 for me. I do not think it's a Pinnacle of modern writing, it definitely suffered from some development struggles and that comes through in the final act as things get a little rushed and content feels more like a drip than a faucet. But then it wraps up well, or I thought it did.
It can use improvements, but I feel about it as i felt about 2 when it came out. "This is a change, and I'm not sure it's what i wanted, but I do like the universe and the combat is a lot of fun and the characters as a whole are interesting".
Veilguard is far from success, and it's because it's the worst-written DA game to date. And that is on EA. They had every chance to make it a good game (as the art book they published shows just what a good story it was shaping up to be before EA forced them to start over for a live service version) but they chose to waste everyone's time for 10 years by changing their mind mid development multiple times, firing the veteran team members right in the middle of development....
They finally confirmed or denied this claim?
If the leaks to be trusted, they expected to sell 10 million copies but now they're talking about they maybe can sell 3 million copies for the lifetime of the game.
In others words, not a success, pretty bad for a IP so famous like Dragon Age
It was very telling EA announced almost right after the launch that they won't release any DLC's and they're moving the team to ME5 already. If that was not the sign EA left DA:V for dead, I don't know what was.
Back of the napkin math says they've already sold about 1.5M on Steam so far. A handful of sales like they one they've got right now should help them easily blow past 3.
Aren't those awful numbers? Like, a big successful AAA grant does way more than 1.5mil in it's first week. If interest was there they'd be over 3mil by now.
It's all going to be relative to what they spent, which I don't know. If they only spent $70M, they already made their money back. It's looking like they'll probably make their money back regardless, unless they spent an entire GTA6 on this thing, which I doubt. These are also only the Steam numbers that I'm calculating based on how many reviews it has; the PS5 version likely did quite well too.
I'm willing to guess up to 3m has been sold across all platforms so far, but this is a major AAA game that was being developed for a full decade, there is no way in hell they didn't spend multiple hundreds of millions on it in total. And those are very low numbers besides. Most big titles sell more than that faster than davg has.
Prototyping and design documentation was likely started a decade ago, but they wouldn't have fully ramped up to a larger team size that's more expensive to sustain for a full decade. In the interim, they put out Anthem, Mass Effect: Andromeda, and remastered the original Mass Effect trilogy. So there is a world where they didn't spend $200M on it, but it also wouldn't surprise me if they hit that number either; and if they did, they'd have to sell about 5M copies to break even (assuming a 70% cut and that not every copy sold is at $70).