322
Frostpunk creators cancel "Project 8" and lay off staff amid concerns that "narrative-driven, story-rich games" don't sell
(www.rockpapershotgun.com)
this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
322 points (97.4% liked)
Games
32940 readers
896 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I only see that in some communities. Most of the people that hate on veilguard, from what I've seen, either haven't played the game or are clipping parts out of context.
The complaints I've seen that aren't "dur hur, binary qunari" talk about the shaky dialogue in the beginning, where things felt awkward and clunky, like a new team forming. I'll give credence to the complaints about some depth being lost in the characters versus other games in the series, but I think those people feel that way because Inquisituon was a bloated mess (that I love) and they've played 1 and 2 so many times in different ways they're meshing all the dialogue into one. Playing through veilguard a second time, and watching my partner take different choices than me, made the characters on par with Mass Effect 2 allies. Which, I'd say isn't an accomplishment so much as a mild chastisement that it hasn't improved since then.
I enjoyed every Dragon-age game so far and Veilguard is no exception. I think the writing is fine. Not great, but good enough. I can see why some people would complain, because it's definitely watered down compared to DA:O. But I am still having fun almost 60 hours into the game.
Someone still took the time to downvote your opinion that it 'was fine'. The vitriol towards any positive or neutral comment is why I think it's a specific group of people actually complaining, a fair share with "it could have been better, and it's not my style of rpg anymore", and the remainder just being relatively neutral to happy that they got more dragon age.
Haven't played, but I found this (negative) review compelling: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QF-Kd2BBpx8
He did play through the whole game.
But, to drive home in case it isn't clear, I love Dragon Age and I think this one ranks higher than Inquisition (but not trespasser DLC), on par with 2, and above 1 for me. I do not think it's a Pinnacle of modern writing, it definitely suffered from some development struggles and that comes through in the final act as things get a little rushed and content feels more like a drip than a faucet. But then it wraps up well, or I thought it did.
It can use improvements, but I feel about it as i felt about 2 when it came out. "This is a change, and I'm not sure it's what i wanted, but I do like the universe and the combat is a lot of fun and the characters as a whole are interesting".