Ask Lemmy

27253 readers

2078 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

6) No US Politics.

Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

138

Do you think kids should be prohibited from using social media? If yes, how should it be done? If no, why? (discuss.tchncs.de)

submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

75 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I saw this article, which made me think about it...

Kids under 16 to be banned from social media after Senate passes world-first laws

Seeing what kind of brainrot kids are watching, makes me think it's a good idea. I wouldn't say all content is bad, but most kids will get hooked on trash content that is intentionally designed to grab their attention.

What would be an effective way to enforce a restriction with the fewest possible side effects? And who should be the one enforcing that restriction in your opinion?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You do know that access to all those things still exists without smartphones, right?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You said "not just social media", implying you wanted to ban smartphones in addition to social media. Those things are social media. If drag has misunderstood and you don't want to ban social media for children, feel free to correct drag

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Again, support for all those things exists outside social media and smart phones.

It's really good for kids to learn how to do these things for themselves without reliance on technology.

Y'all never would have survived the 80s.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You mean during the AIDS epidemic when many gay people died because of lack of access to information on safe sex?

Yeah, we would've...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, there was plenty of information and support from other people, what got folks killed was the lack of information, funding, and support from the government.

Where I grew up, in the 80s, the place was called Looking Glass and they're still around. We didn't need social media or a smart phone to find them.

https://www.lookingglass.us/