this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
216 points (95.4% liked)

Technology

59424 readers
3919 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
216
Bluesky Announces Series A to Grow Network of 13M+ Users - Bluesky (bsky.social)
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Alternative Title: "Bluesky pretty sure these leopards won't eat their face."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Bluesky's federation model is actually quite interesting, they go for a very portable approach vs activitypub's instance-basis. Unfortunately, there's still a massive centralization point (the main relay, the only thing that can really handle the firehose), and identity is also centralized, albeit has mechanisms to be decentralized.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Aren't identities already decentralized by using domains you own as your identity? Ex. Incase you're unfamiliar, my Bluesky @ is my domain I own.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I believe that's your handle, not your identity. Your handle resolves to your identity, but your identity isn't directly tied to it, in case you lose the domain.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

While they definitely do this for handles I'm pretty confident this is also done for DIDs (Decentralized identifiers) and it doesn't provide a solution if you lose your domain. I think Bluesky (Appview) specifically gets around this by also tying your DID:web to your DID:plc, in case of domain loss. So I think it exists on the protocol but they don't automatically utilize the decentralization for end-user experience(domain loss) but other appviews can. But I could be wrong.

https://atproto.com/specs/did

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, did:web exists, but I still called it centralized because it still relies on did:plc pretty much everywhere (though honestly domain name handles might actually be did:web, not sure). Didn't know about that dual setup by Bluesky though!