this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
228 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

60055 readers
2823 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, the whole concept of "national" TLDs is proving to be a rather poor one in practice. Very few of them actually make sense in the way they're used.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That sounds more like an issue of enforcement than anything. If anyone can register a domain with your country's extension, it's not really your country's extension.

If we handled it properly, those domains would have value.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but when management fails the impact should not be imposed on the subordinates for following the process; it should be entirely on management.

In practice, this would mean creating a more stringent DNS approach to ccTLD's that does not impact existing domains until if/when they choose to adopt it. Ultimately it just shows ICANN's inadequacy &/or incompetence, which I guarantee has more to do with it's management than it's engineers/workers.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Ultimately it just shows ICANN’s inadequacy &/or incompetence,

I’m pretty sure it’s intentional that the owners of the top level domain set the rules for it. Why should ICANN control someone else’s portion of the internet?

This was especially a big deal as the internet expanded from the US to a global presence - you can understand why various countries wouldn’t want US control over their “territory”, wouldn’t cooperate without some form of self-determination

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Exactly, and I say this as a US citizen who benefits from a US-centric system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not talking about ICANN or the US controlling other countries domains. This problem goes way back to net, org, com — basically all "rules" applied since inception were loosey goosey suggestions that depended on nothing more than convention, and were not well thought out.

So deleting .io would really be on-brand, and a continuation of that incompetence.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Not at all. The rules were developed over time as the internet expanded from a handful of us research institutions to the global presence it is today. As other people in this thread mentioned, the present country code top level domain rules were developed from fiascoes like .su and .yu. Now they do have solid rules: they should follow them, regardless of corporate speculation and profiteering